[1] Vide pp. 60 92, 96 97, 134, 135 and elsewhere in Mr WAITE’S translation.

[2] Ibid., p. 57

[3] Ibid., pp. 179-181 (second recension); cf. pp. 103-104.

The use of the mystical symbols of death (putrefaction) and resurrection or rebirth to represent the consummation of the alchemical work, and that of the phallic symbols of the conjunction of the sexes and the development of the foetus, both of which we have found in the Turba, are current throughout the course of Latin alchemy.  In The Chymical Marriage of Christian Rosencreutz, that extraordinary document of what is called “Rosicrucianism”—­a symbolic romance of considerable ability, whoever its author was,[1]—­an attempt is made to weld the two sets of symbols—­the one of marriage, the other of death and resurrection unto glory—­into one allegorical narrative; and it is to this fusion of seemingly disparate concepts that much of its fantasticality is due.  Yet the concepts are not really disparate; for not only is the second birth like unto the first, and not only is the resurrection unto glory described as the Bridal Feast of the Lamb, but marriage is, in a manner, a form of death and rebirth.  To justify this in a crude sense, I might say that, from the male standpoint at least, it is a giving of the life-substance to the beloved that life may be born anew and increase.  But in a deeper sense it is, or rather should be, as an ideal, a mutual sacrifice of self for each other’s good—­a death of the self that it may arise with an enriched personality.

[1] See Mr WAITE’S The Real History of the Rosicrucians (1887) for translation and discussion as to origin and significance.  The work was first published (in German) at Strassburg in 1616.

It is when we come to an examination of the ideas at the root of, and associated with, the alchemical concept of “principles,” that we find some difficulty in harmonising the two series of symbols—­the mystical and the phallic.  In one place in the Turba we are directed “to take quicksilver, in which is the male potency or strength";[2a] and this concept of mercury as male is quite in accord with the mystical origin I have assigned in the preceding excursion to the doctrine of the alchemical principles.  I have shown, I think, that salt, sulphur, and mercury are the analogues ex hypothesi of the body, soul (affection and volition), and spirit (intelligence or understanding) in man; and the affections are invariably regarded as especially feminine, the understanding as especially masculine.  But it seems that the more common opinion, amongst Latin alchemists at any rate, was that sulphur was male and mercury female.  Writes BERNARD of TREVISAN:  “For the Matter suffereth, and the Form acteth assimulating the Matter to itself, and according to this manner the Matter naturally thirsteth after a Form, as a Woman desireth an Husband, and a Vile thing a precious one, and an