under a sky of the most intense blue—that
the master shows himself supreme. Nature is therein
not so much detailed as synthesised with a sweeping
breadth which makes of the scene not the reflection
of one beautiful spot in the Venetian territory, but
without loss of essential truth or character a very
type of Venetian landscape of the sixteenth century.
These herdsmen and their flocks, and also the note
of warning in the sky of supernatural splendour, recall
the beautiful Venetian storm-landscape in the royal
collection at Buckingham Palace. This has been
very generally attributed to Titian himself,[4] and
described as the only canvas still extant in which
he has made landscape his one and only theme.
It has, indeed, a rare and mysterious power to move,
a true poetry of interpretation. A fleeting moment,
full of portent as well as of beauty, has been seized;
the smile traversed by a frown of the stormy sky,
half overshadowing half revealing the wooded slopes,
the rich plain, and the distant mountains, is rendered
with a rare felicity. The beauty is, all the
same, in the conception and in the thing actually
seen—much less in the actual painting.
It is hardly possible to convince oneself, comparing
the work with such landscape backgrounds as those
in this picture at the National Gallery in the somewhat
earlier
Madonna del Coniglio, and the gigantic
St. Peter Martyr, or, indeed, in a score of
other genuine productions, that the depth, the vigour,
the authority of Titian himself are here to be recognised.
The weak treatment of the great Titianesque tree in
the foreground, with its too summarily indicated foliage—to
select only one detail that comes naturally to hand—would
in itself suffice to bring such an attribution into
question.
[Illustration: Madonna and Child with St.
Catherine and St. John the Baptist. National
Gallery. From a Photograph by Morelli.]
Vasari states, speaking confessedly from hearsay,
that in 1530, the Emperor Charles V. being at Bologna,
Titian was summoned thither by Cardinal Ippolito de’
Medici, using Aretino as an intermediary, and that
he on that occasion executed a most admirable portrait
of His Majesty, all in arms, which had so much success
that the artist received as a present a thousand scudi.
Crowe and Cavalcaselle, however, adduce strong evidence
to prove that Titian was busy in Venice for Federigo
Gonzaga at the time of the Emperor’s first visit,
and that he only proceeded to Bologna in July to paint
for the Marquess of Mantua the portrait of a Bolognese
beauty, La Cornelia, the lady-in-waiting of
the Countess Pepoli, whom Covas, the all-powerful political
secretary of Charles the Fifth, had seen and admired
at the splendid entertainments given by the Pepoli
to the Emperor. Vasari has in all probability
confounded this journey of Charles in 1530 with that
subsequent one undertaken in 1532 when Titian not
only portrayed the Emperor, but also painted an admirable