These qualities were, of course, gifts of nature, improved and developed by the training of a life of action on a great scale.  He had received, indeed, little teaching except that of experience, and the world of war and politics had been to him both school and college.  His education had been limited in the extreme, scarcely going beyond the most rudimentary branches except in mathematics, and this is very apparent in his early letters.  He seems always to have written a handsome hand and to have been good at figures, but his spelling at the outset was far from perfect, and his style, although vigorous, was abrupt and rough.  He felt this himself, took great pains to correct his faults in this respect, and succeeded, as he did in most things.  Mr. Sparks has produced a false impression in this matter by smoothing and amending in very extensive fashion all the earlier letters, so as to give an appearance of uniformity throughout the correspondence; a process which not only destroyed much of the vigor and force of the early writings, but made them somewhat unnatural.  The surveyor and frontier soldier wrote very differently from the general of the army and the President of the United States, and the improvements of Mr. Sparks only served to hide the real man.[1]

[Footnote 1:  These facts in regard to Washington’s early letters, and to his correspondence generally, were first brought to public attention by the Reed letters, and by the controversy between Mr. Sparks and Lord Mahon.  They have, of course, been long familiar to students of the original manuscripts.  The full extent, however, of the changes made by Mr. Sparks, and of the mischief he wrought, and of the injustice thus done both to his hero and to posterity, has but lately been made known generally by the new edition of Washington’s papers which have been published, under the supervision of Mr. W.C.  Ford.  Washington himself, when he undertook to arrange his military and state papers after his retirement from the presidency, began to correct the style of some of his earlier letters.  This was natural enough, and he had a right to do what he pleased with his own, even if he thereby injured the material of the future historian and biographer.  But he did not proceed far in his work, and the fact that he corrected a few of his own letters gave Mr. Sparks no right whatever to enter upon a wholesale revision.]

If Washington had been of coarse fibre and heavy mind, this lack of education would have troubled him but little.  His great success in that case would have served only to convince him of the uselessness of education except for inferior persons, who could not get along in the world without artificial aids.  As it was, he never ceased to regret his deficiency in this respect, and when Humphreys urged him to prepare a history or memoirs of the war, he replied:  “In a former letter I informed you, my dear Humphreys, that if I had talent for it, I have not leisure to