foreign policy was a declaration to the world of a
new national existence, and he strained every nerve
to lift our politics from the colonial condition of
foreign issues. He wished all immigration to
be absorbed and moulded here, so that we might be one
people, one in speech and in political faith.
His last words, given to the world after the grave
had closed over him, were a solemn plea for a home
training for the youth of the Republic, so that all
men might think as Americans, untainted by foreign
ideas, and rise above all local prejudices. He
did not believe that mere material development was
the only or the highest goal; for he knew that the
true greatness of a nation was moral and intellectual,
and his last thoughts were for the up-building of
character and intelligence. He was never a braggart,
and mere boasting about his country as about himself
was utterly repugnant to him. He never hesitated
to censure what he believed to be wrong, but he addressed
his criticisms to his countrymen in order to lead
them to better things, and did not indulge in them
in order to express his own discontent, or to amuse
or curry favor with foreigners. In a word, he
loved his country, and had an abiding faith in its
future and in its people, upon whom his most earnest
thoughts and loftiest aspirations were centred.
No higher, purer, or more thorough Americanism than
his could be imagined. It was a conception far
in advance of the time, possible only to a powerful
mind, capable of lifting itself out of existing conditions
and alien influences, so that it might look with undazzled
gaze upon the distant future. The first American
in the broad national sense, there has never been a
man more thoroughly and truly American than Washington.
It will be a sorry day when we consent to take that
noble figure from “the forefront of the nation’s
life,” and rank George Washington as anything
but an American of Americans, instinct with the ideas,
as he was devoted to the fortunes of the New World
which gave him birth.
There is another class of critics who have attacked
Washington from another side. These are the gentlemen
who find him in the way of their own heroes.
Washington was a man of decided opinions about men
as well as measures, and he was extremely positive.
He had his enemies as well as his friends, his likes
and his dislikes, strong and clear, according to his
nature. The respect which he commanded in his
life has lasted unimpaired since his death, and it
is an awkward thing for the biographers of some of
his contemporaries to know that Washington opposed,
distrusted, or disliked their heroes. Therefore,
in one way or another they have gone round a stumbling-block
which they could not remove. The commonest method
is to eliminate Washington by representing him vaguely
as the great man with whom every one agreed, who belonged
to no party, and favored all; then he is pushed quietly
aside. Evils and wrong-doing existed under his
administration from the opposition point of view,