Rosenkranzfest, painted some eight years previously
for the Church of San Bartolommeo, adjacent to the
Fondaco de’ Tedeschi. This particularity,
noted by the author of the
Vite, and, in some
passages, a certain hardness and opacity of colour,
give rise to the surmise that, even in the parts of
the picture which belong to Bellini, the co-operation
of Basaiti may be traced. It was he who most
probably painted the background and the figure of
St. Jerome in the master’s altar-piece finished
in the preceding year for S. Giovanni Crisostomo;
it was he, too, who to a great extent executed, though
he cannot have wholly devised, the Bellinesque
Madonna
in Glory with Eight Saints in the Church of San
Pietro Martire at Murano, which belongs to this exact
period. Even in the
Madonna of the Brera
Gallery (1510), which shows Gian Bellino’s finest
landscape of the late time, certain hardnesses of colour
in the main group suggest the possibility of a minor
co-operation by Basaiti. Some passages of the
Bacchanal, however—especially the
figures of the two blond, fair-breasted goddesses
or nymphs who, in a break in the trees, stand relieved
against the yellow bands of a sunset sky—are
as beautiful as anything that Venetian art in its
Bellinesque phase has produced up to the date of the
picture’s appearance. Very suggestive of
Bellini is the way in which the hair of some of the
personages is dressed in heavy formal locks, such
as can only be produced by artificial means.
These are to be found, no doubt, chiefly in his earliest
or Paduan period, when they are much more defined and
rigid. Still this coiffure—for as
such it must be designated—is to be found
more or less throughout the master’s career.
It is very noticeable in the
Allegories just
mentioned.
[Illustration: Alessandro de’ Medici
(so called). Hampton Court. From a Photograph
by Spooner & Co.]
Infinitely pathetic is the old master’s vain
attempt to infuse into the chosen subject the measure
of Dionysiac vehemence that it requires. An atmosphere
of unruffled peace, a grand serenity, unconsciously
betraying life-weariness, replaces the amorous unrest
that courses like fire through the veins of his artistic
offspring, Giorgione and Titian. The audacious
gestures and movements naturally belonging to this
rustic festival, in which the gods unbend and, after
the homelier fashion of mortals, rejoice, are indicated;
but they are here gone through, it would seem, only
pour la forme. A careful examination of
the picture substantially confirms Vasari’s
story that the Feast of the Gods was painted
upon by Titian, or to put it otherwise, suggests in
many passages a Titianesque hand. It may well
be, at the same time, that Crowe and Cavalcaselle
are right in their conjecture that what the younger
master did was rather to repair injury to the last
work of the elder and supplement it by his own than
to complete a picture left unfinished by him.