had either changed his sentiments, or that he had made up a set of constitutional opinions accommodated to any particular combination of political occurrences.  Had I done so, I should have felt, that, while I was entitled to little credit in thus questioning other people’s motives, I justified the whole world in suspecting my own.  But how has the gentleman returned this respect for others’ opinions?  His own candor and justice, how have they been exhibited towards the motives of others, while he has been at so much pains to maintain, what nobody has disputed, the purity of his own?  Why, Sir, he has asked when, and how, and why New England votes were found going for measures favorable to the West.  He has demanded to be informed whether all this did not begin in 1825, and while the election of President was still pending.

Sir, to these questions retort would be justified; and it is both cogent and at hand.  Nevertheless, I will answer the inquiry, not by retort, but by facts.  I will tell the gentleman when, and how, and why New England has supported measures favorable to the West.  I have already referred to the early history of the government, to the first acquisition of the lands, to the original laws for disposing of them, and for governing the territories where they lie; and have shown the influence of New England men and New England principles in all these leading measures.  I should not be pardoned were I to go over that ground again.  Coming to more recent times, and to measures of a less general character, I have endeavored to prove that every thing of this kind, designed for Western improvement, has depended on the votes of New England; all this is true beyond the power of contradiction.  And now, Sir, there are two measures to which I will refer, not so ancient as to belong to the early history of the public lands, and not so recent as to be on this side of the period when the gentleman charitably imagines a new direction may have been given to New England feeling and New England votes.  These measures, and the New England votes in support of them, may be taken as samples and specimens of all the rest.

In 1820 (observe, Mr. President, in 1820) the people of the West besought Congress for a reduction in the price of lands.  In favor of that reduction, New England, with a delegation of forty members in the other house, gave thirty-three votes, and one only against it.  The four Southern States, with more than fifty members, gave thirty-two votes for it, and seven against it.  Again, in 1821, (observe again, Sir, the time,) the law passed for the relief of the purchasers of the public lands.  This was a measure of vital importance to the West, and more especially to the Southwest.  It authorized the relinquishment of contracts for lands which had been entered into at high prices, and a reduction in other cases of not less than thirty-seven and a half per cent on the purchase-money.  Many millions of dollars,