There is another particular, Sir, in which the honorable member’s quick perception of resemblances might, I should think, have seen something in the story of Banquo, making it not altogether a subject of the most pleasant contemplation.  Those who murdered Banquo, what did they win by it?  Substantial good?  Permanent power?  Or disappointment, rather, and sore mortification,—­dust and ashes, the common fate of vaulting ambition overleaping itself?  Did not even-handed justice erelong commend the poisoned chalice to their own lips?  Did they not soon find that for another they had “filed their mind”? that their ambition, though apparently for the moment successful, had but put a barren sceptre in their grasp?  Ay, Sir,

                “a barren sceptre in their gripe,
    Thence to be wrenched with an unlineal hand,
    No son of theirs succeeding.”

Sir, I need pursue the allusion no farther.  I leave the honorable gentleman to run it out at his leisure, and to derive from it all the gratification it is calculated to administer.  If he finds himself pleased with the associations, and prepared to be quite satisfied, though the parallel should be entirely completed, I had almost said, I am satisfied also; but that I shall think of.  Yes, Sir, I will think of that.

In the course of my observations the other day, Mr. President, I paid a passing tribute of respect to a very worthy man, Mr. Dane of Massachusetts.  It so happened that he drew the Ordinance of 1787, for the government of the Northwestern Territory.  A man of so much ability, and so little pretence; of so great a capacity to do good, and so unmixed a disposition to do it for its own sake; a gentleman who had acted an important part, forty years ago, in a measure the influence of which is still deeply felt in the very matter which was the subject of debate,—­might, I thought, receive from me a commendatory recognition.  But the honorable member was inclined to be facetious on the subject.  He was rather disposed to make it matter of ridicule, that I had introduced into the debate the name of one Nathan Dane, of whom he assures us he had never before heard.  Sir, if the honorable member had never before heard of Mr. Dane, I am sorry for it.  It shows him less acquainted with the public men of the country than I had supposed.  Let me tell him, however, that a sneer from him at the mention of the name of Mr. Dane is in bad taste.  It may well be a high mark of ambition, Sir, either with the honorable gentleman or myself, to accomplish as much to make our names known to advantage, and remembered with gratitude, as Mr. Dane has accomplished.  But the truth is, Sir, I suspect, that Mr. Dane lives a little too far north.  He is of Massachusetts, and too near the north star to be reached by the honorable gentleman’s telescope.  If his sphere had happened to range south of Mason and Dixon’s line, he might, probably, have come within the scope of his vision.