“The day after the Declaration was made, Mr. Adams, in writing to a friend,[14] declared the event to be one that ’ought to be commemorated, as the day of deliverance, by solemn acts of devotion to God Almighty.  It ought to be solemnized with pomp and parade, with shows, games, sports, guns, bells, bonfires, and illuminations, from one end of this continent to the other, from this time forward, for evermore.’

“And on the day of his death, hearing the noise of bells and cannon, he asked the occasion.  On being reminded that it was ‘Independent day,’ he replied, ‘Independence for ever!’ These expressions were introduced into the speech supposed to have been made by him.  For the rest I must be answerable.  The speech was written by me, in my house in Boston, the day before the delivery of the Discourse in Faneuil Hall; a poor substitute, I am sure it would appear to be, if we could now see the speech actually made by Mr. Adams on that transcendently important occasion.

“I am, respectfully,

“Your obedient servant,

“DANIEL WEBSTER.”

[Footnote 1:  Hon. Josiah Quincy.]

[Footnote 2:  Nearly all that was known of this celebrated argument, at the time the present Discourse was delivered, was derived from the recollections of John Adams, as preserved in Minot’s History of Massachusetts, Vol.  II. p. 91.  See Life and Works of John Adams, Vol.  II. p. 124, published in the course of the past year (1850), in the Appendix to which, p. 521, will be found a paper hitherto unpublished, containing notes of the argument of Otis, “which seem to be the foundation of the sketch published by Minot.”  Tudor’s Life of James Otis, p. 61.]

[Footnote 3:  See Life and Works of John Adams, Vol.  II. p. 150, Vol.  III. p. 447, and North American Review, Vol.  LXXI. p. 430.]

[Footnote 4:  Cicero de Officiis, Lib.  I. sec. 43.]

[Footnote 5:  A fac-simile of this ever-memorable state paper, as drafted by Mr. Jefferson, with the interlineations alluded to in the text, is contained in Mr. Jefferson’s Writings, Vol.  I. p. 146.  See, also, in reference to the history of the Declaration, the Life and Works of John Adams, Vol.  II. p. 512 et seq.]

[Footnote 6:  This question, of the power of Parliament over the Colonies, was discussed, with singular ability, by Governor Hutchinson on the one side, and the House of Representatives of Massachusetts on the other, in 1773.  The argument of the House is in the form of an answer to the Governor’s Message, and was reported by Mr. Samuel Adams, Mr. Hancock, Mr. Hawley, Mr. Bowers, Mr. Hobson, Mr. Foster, Mr. Phillips, and Mr. Thayer.  As the power of the Parliament had been acknowledged, so far at least as to affect us by laws of trade, it was not easy to settle the line of distinction.  It was thought, however, to be very clear, that the charters of the Colonies had exempted them from the general legislation of the British Parliament.  See Massachusetts State Papers, p. 351.  The important assistance rendered by John Adams in the preparation of the answer of the House to the Message of the Governor may be learned from the Life and Works of John Adams, Vol.  II. p. 311 et seq.]