in its application to any other commodity as to silver.  One man makes a yard of cloth at home; another raises agricultural products and buys a yard of imported cloth.  Both these are equally the earnings of domestic industry, and the only questions that arise in the case are two:  the first is, which is the best mode, under all the circumstances, of obtaining the article; the second is, how far this first question is proper to be decided by government, and how far it is proper to be left to individual discretion.  There is no foundation for the distinction which attributes to certain employments the peculiar appellation of American industry; and it is, in my judgment, extremely unwise to attempt such discriminations.

We are asked, What nations have ever attained eminent prosperity without encouraging manufactures?  I may ask, What nation ever reached the like prosperity without promoting foreign trade?  I regard these interests as closely connected, and am of opinion that it should be our aim to cause them to flourish together.  I know it would be very easy to promote manufactures, at least for a time, but probably for a short time only, if we might act in disregard of other interests.  We could cause a sudden transfer of capital, and a violent change in the pursuits of men.  We could exceedingly benefit some classes by these means.  But what, then, becomes of the interests of others?  The power of collecting revenue by duties on imports, and the habit of the government of collecting almost its whole revenue in that mode, will enable us, without exceeding the bounds of moderation, to give great advantages to those classes of manufactures which we may think most useful to promote at home.  What I object to is the immoderate use of the power,—­exclusions and prohibitions; all of which, as I think, not only interrupt the pursuits of individuals, with great injury to themselves and little or no benefit to the country, but also often divert our own labor, or, as it may very properly be called, our own domestic industry, from those occupations in which it is well employed and well paid, to others in which it will be worse employed and worse paid.  For my part, I see very little relief to those who are likely to be deprived of their employments, or who find the prices of the commodities which they need raised, in any of the alternatives which Mr. Speaker has presented.  It is nothing to say that they may, if they choose, continue to buy the foreign article; the answer is, the price is augmented:  nor that they may use the domestic article; the price of that also is increased.  Nor can they supply themselves by the substitution of their own fabric.  How can the agriculturist make his own iron?  How can the ship-owner grow his own hemp?