to develop its power it must embrace at the same time
the most varied phases of evolution. A nation
over-refined by culture and satiated with prosperity
is a dead nation, for whom nothing remains but, like
Sardanapalus, to burn itself up together with all
its magnificence. The blase city man, the
fat farmer of the rich corn-land, may be the men of
the present; but the poverty-stricken peasant of the
moors, the rough, hardy peasant of the forests, the
lonely, self-reliant Alpine shepherd, full of legends
and songs—these are the men of the future.
Civil society is founded on the doctrine of the natural
inequality of mankind. Indeed, in this inequality
of talents and of callings is rooted the highest glory
of society, for it is the source of its inexhaustible
vital energy. As the sea preserves the vigor
of the people of the coast-lands by keeping them in
a hardy natural state, so does the forest produce a
similar effect on the people of the interior.
Therefore since Germany has such a large expanse of
interior country, it needs just that much more forest-land
than does England. The genuine woodland villagers,
the foresters, wood-cutters, and forest laborers are
the strong, rude seamen among us landlubbers.
Uproot the forests, level the mountains, and shut out
the sea, if you want to equalize society in a closet-civilization
where all will have the same polish and all be of
the same color. We have seen that entire flourishing
lands which have been robbed of the protecting forests
have fallen prey to the devastating floods of the mountain
streams and the scorching breath of the storms.
A large part of Italy, the paradise of Europe, is
a land which has, ceased to live, because its soil
no longer bears any forests under the protection of
which it might become rejuvenated. And not only
is the land exhausted, but the people are, likewise.
A nation must die off when it can no longer have recourse
to the back-woodsmen in order to gather from them the
fresh strength of a natural, hardy, national life.
A nation without considerable forest-property is worthy
of the same consideration as a nation without requisite
sea-coast. We must preserve our forests not only
so that our stoves shall not be cold in winter, but
also that the pulse of the nation’s life shall
continue to throb on warmly and cheerfully—in
short, so that Germany shall remain German.
The inhabitants of the German woodland villages have almost always a far fresher, more individual, mental stamp than the inhabitants of the villages of the plain. In the latter we find more sleek prosperity side by side with greater degeneracy of morals, than in the former. The inhabitant of the woodland villages is often very poor, but the discontented proletarian dwells far more frequently in the villages of the plain. The latter is more important in an economic sense, the former in a social-political one. The forest peasant is rougher, more quarrelsome, but also merrier than the peasant of the field; the