no threatening danger to demand his continuance at
the helm. Many persons thought that he was more
than glad to be relieved of the increasing abuse of
the scurrilous editors. No doubt he was, but we
can hardly agree that merely for the sake of that
relief he would abandon his Presidential post.
But does it not seem more likely that his unwillingness
to convert the Presidency into a life office, and
so to give the critics of the American experiment
a valid cause for opposition, led him to establish
the precedent that two terms were enough? More
than once in the century and a quarter since he retired
in 1797, over-ambitious Presidents have schemed to
win a third election and flattering sycophants have
encouraged them to believe that they could attain it.
But before they came to the test Washington’s
example—“no more than two”—has
blocked their advance. In this respect also we
must admit that he looked far into the future and
saw what would be best for posterity. The second
term as it has proved is bad enough, diverting a President
during his first term to devote much of his energy
and attention to setting traps to secure the second.
It might be better to have only one term to last six
years, instead of four, which would enable a President
to give all his time to the duties of his office,
instead of giving a large part of it to the chase after
a reelection.
As soon as Washington determined irrevocably to retire,
he began thinking of the “Farewell Address”
which he desired to deliver to his countrymen as the
best legacy he could bequeath. Several years before
he had talked it over with Madison, with whom he was
then on very friendly terms, and Madison had drafted
a good deal of it. Now he turned to Hamilton,
giving him the topics as far as they had been outlined,
and bidding him to rewrite it if he thought it desirable.
In September, 1796, Washington read the “Address”
before the assembled Congress.
The “Farewell Address” belongs among the
few supreme utterances on human government. Its
author seems to be completely detached from all personal
or local interests. He tries to see the thing
as it is, and as it is likely to be in its American
environment. His advice applies directly to the
American people, and only in so far as what he says
has in a large sense human pertinence do we find in
it more than a local application.
“Be united” is the summary and inspiration
of the entire “Address.” “Be
united and be American”; as an individual each
person must feel himself most strongly an American.
He urges against the poisonous effects of parties.
He warns against the evils that may arise when parties
choose different foreign nations for their favorites.