scarcely credible, never uttering a single groan.  But horrible as the excesses might have been, which occasioned these punishments, it muse be remembered, that they were committed by ignorant savages, who had been dragged from all they held most dear; whose patience had been exhausted by a cruel and loathsome confinement during their transportation; and whose resentment had been wound up to the highest pitch of fury by the lash of the driver.

But he would now mention another instance, by way of contrast, out of the evidence.  A child on board a slave-ship, of about ten months old, took sulk and would not eat.  The captain flogged it with a cat; swearing that he would make it eat, or kill it.  From this and other ill-treatment the child’s legs swelled.  He then ordered some water to be made hot to abate the swelling.  But even his tender mercies were cruel; for the cook, on putting his hand into the water, said it was too hot.  Upon this the captain swore at him, and ordered the feet to be put in.  This was done.  The nails and skin came off.  Oiled cloths were then put round them.  The child was at length tied to a heavy log.  Two or three days afterwards, the captain caught it up again; and repeated that he would make it eat, or kill it.  He immediately flogged it again, and in a quarter of an hour it died.  But, after the child was dead, whom should the barbarian select to throw it overboard, but the wretched mother?  In vain she started from the office.  He beat her, till he made her take up the child and carry it to the side of the vessel.  She then dropped it into the sea, turning her head the other way that she might not see it.  Now it would naturally be asked, Was not this captain also gibbered alive?  Alas! although the execrable, barbarity of the European exceeded that of the Africans before mentioned, almost as much as his opportunities of instruction had been greater than theirs, no notice whatsoever was taken of this horrible action; and a thousand similar cruelties had been committed in this abominable trade with equal impunity:  but he would say no more.  He should vote for the abolition, not only as it would do away all the evils complained of in Africa and the Middle Passage; but as it would be the most effectual means of ameliorating the condition of those unhappy persons, who were still to continue slaves in the British colonies.

Mr. Courtenay rose.  He said, he could not but consider the assertion of Sir William Yonge as a mistake, that the Slave-trade, if abandoned by us, would fall into the hands of France.  It ought to be recollected, with what approbation the motion for abolishing it, made by the late Mirabeau, had been received; although the situation of the French colonies might then have presented obstacles to carrying the measure into immediate execution.  He had no doubt, if parliament were to begin, so wise and enlightened a body as the National Assembly would follow the example.  But even if France were not to relinquish the trade, how could we, if justice required its abolition, hesitate as to our part of it?