on the part of Great Britain having been rejected,
the British plenipotentiary requested that a proposal
should be made by the United States for “an equitable
adjustment of the question.” When I came
into office I found this to be the state of the negotiation.
Though entertaining the settled conviction that the
British pretensions of title could not be maintained
to any portion of the Oregon Territory upon any principle
of public law recognized by nations, yet in deference
to what had been done by my predecessors, and especially
in consideration that propositions of compromise had
been thrice made by two preceding Administrations to
adjust the question on the parallel of 49 deg., and
in two of them yielding to Great Britain the free
navigation of the Columbia, and that the pending negotiation
had been commenced on the basis of compromise, I deemed
it to be my duty not abruptly to break it off.
In consideration, too, that under the conventions
of 1818 and 1827 the citizens and subjects of the
two powers held a joint occupancy of the country, I
was induced to make another effort to settle this
long-pending controversy in the spirit of moderation
which had given birth to the renewed discussion.
A proposition was accordingly made, which was rejected
by the British plenipotentiary, who, without submitting
any other proposition, suffered the negotiation on
his part to drop, expressing his trust that the United
States would offer what he saw fit to call “some
further proposal for the settlement of the Oregon question
more consistent with fairness and equity and with
the reasonable expectations of the British Government.”
The proposition thus offered and rejected repeated
the offer of the parallel of 49 deg. of north latitude,
which had been made by two preceding Administrations,
but without proposing to surrender to Great Britain,
as they had done, the free navigation of the Columbia
River. The right of any foreign power to the free
navigation of any of our rivers through the heart
of our country was which I was unwilling to concede.
I also embraced a provision to make free to Great
Britain any port or ports on the cap of Quadra and
Vancouvers Island south of this parallel. Had
this been a new question, coming under discussion
for the first time, this proposition would not have
been made. The extraordinary and wholly inadmissible
demands of the British Government and the rejection
of the proposition made in deference alone to what
had been done by my predecessors and the implied obligation
which their acts seemed to impose afford satisfactory
evidence that no compromise which the United States
ought to accept can be effected. With this conviction
the proposition of compromise which had been made and
rejected was by my direction subsequently withdrawn
and our title to the whole Oregon Territory asserted,
and, as is believed, maintained by irrefragable facts
and arguments.
The civilized world will see in these proceedings a spirit of liberal concession on the part of the United States, and this Government will be relieved from all responsibility which may follow the failure to settle the controversy.