Three out of many “negligences, and ignorances” in managing the health of houses generally, I will here mention as specimens—­1.  That the female head in charge of any building does not think it necessary to visit every hole and corner of it every day.  How can she expect those who are under her to be more careful to maintain her house in a healthy condition than she who is in charge of it?—­2.  That it is not considered essential to air, to sun, and to clean rooms while uninhabited; which is simply ignoring the first elementary notion of sanitary things, and laying the ground ready for all kinds of diseases.—­3.  That the window, and one window, is considered enough to air a room.  Have you never observed that any room without a fire-place is always close?  And, if you have a fire-place, would you cram it up not only with a chimney-board, but perhaps with a great wisp of brown paper, in the throat of the chimney—­to prevent the soot from coming down, you say?  If your chimney is foul, sweep it; but don’t expect that you can ever air a room with only one aperture; don’t suppose that to shut up a room is the way to keep it clean.  It is the best way to foul the room and all that is in it.  Don’t imagine that if you, who are in charge, don’t look to all these things yourself, those under you will be more careful than you are.  It appears as if the part of a mistress now is to complain of her servants, and to accept their excuses—­not to show them how there need be neither complaints made nor excuses.

[Sidenote:  Head in charge must see to House Hygiene, not do it herself.]

But again, to look to all these things yourself does not mean to do them yourself.  “I always open the windows,” the head in charge often says.  If you do it, it is by so much the better, certainly, than if it were not done at all.  But can you not insure that it is done when not done by yourself?  Can you insure that it is not undone when your back is turned?  This is what being “in charge” means.  And a very important meaning it is, too.  The former only implies that just what you can do with your own hands is done.  The latter that what ought to be done is always done.

[Sidenote:  Does God think of these things so seriously?]

And now, you think these things trifles, or at least exaggerated.  But what you “think” or what I “think” matters little.  Let us see what God thinks of them.  God always justifies His ways.  While we are thinking, He has been teaching.  I have known cases of hospital pyaemia quite as severe in handsome private houses as in any of the worst hospitals, and from the same cause, viz., foul air.  Yet nobody learnt the lesson.  Nobody learnt anything at all from it.  They went on thinking—­ thinking that the sufferer had scratched his thumb, or that it was singular that “all the servants” had “whitlows,” or that something was “much about this year; there is always sickness in our house.”  This is a favourite mode of thought—­leading not to inquire what is the uniform cause of these general “whitlows,” but to stifle all inquiry.  In what sense is “sickness” being “always there,” a justification of its being “there” at all?