an orchestra whose members played in the Pierian Sodality.
The merriment of the lines was more robust than delicate,
but with some pruning it passed. The bill of announcement,
which was hung up in the Pudding room, and which possibly
is still preserved, was very elaborately and handsomely
designed, and I think was the work of Alexander Agassiz,
who had much skill of that kind. The performers
were all strenuous and some capable, but the hit of
the evening was Phillips Brooks, who personated the
giantess Glumdalca to perfection. He was then
nineteen, and had reached his full stature. He
was attired in flowing skirts and befitting bodice,
and wore a towering head-dress of feather dusters
or something similar, which swept the ceiling as he
strode. I had been cast originally for the Queen,
but it was afterwards judged that I had special qualifications
for the part of Princess. Like the youths in Comus,
my unrazored lips in those days were as smooth as
Hebe’s, and I had a slenderness that was quite
in keeping. Dressed in an old brocade gown, an
heirloom from the century before, with a lofty white
wig, and proper patches upon my pink cheeks, I essayed
the role of
une belle dame sans merci.
Brooks and I were rivals for the affection of Tom Thumb,
and I do not recall which succeeded. The tragedy
was most extreme. In the closing scene the entire
cast underwent destruction, strewing the stage with
a picturesque heap of slain. We were not so very
dead, for the victims near the foot-lights in order
to give the curtain room to fall, drew up their legs
or rolled out of the way, in a spirit of polite accommodation.
The most impressive part of the spectacle was the
defunct giantess, whose wide-spreading draperies and
head-gear, as Brooks came down with a well-studied
crash, took up so much of the floor that the rest
of us had no room left to die in dignity. The
piece was so much of a success that we performed it
again at the house of Theodore Lyman, in Brookline,—and
still again, at Chickering Hall in Boston.
Though Brooks could frolic upon occasion, his mood
in his student days was prevailingly grave, and as
he matured, warmed, and deepened into earnest religious
conviction. My own close association with him
came to an end at our graduation. Our respective
fates led us in fields widely apart, and we met only
at rare intervals. Ten years after graduation
we came together in a way for me memorable. He
was already held in the affectionate reverence of
multitudes, and perhaps established in the position
in which he so long stood as the most moving and venerated
of American preachers. At the commemoration for
the Harvard soldiers, in 1865, he was the chaplain,
and his prayer shares with the Commemoration Ode
of Lowell the admiration of men as an utterance especially
uplifting. My humble function on that day was
to speak for the rank and file, and Brooks and I, as
classmates, sat elbow to elbow at the table under the
great tent. He was charmingly genial and brotherly.