or some other equivalent, the earth would mount to
the moon by a fifty-fourth part of their distance,
and the moon fall towards the earth through the other
fifty-three parts, and they would there meet, assuming,
however, that the substance of both is of the same
density. If the earth should cease to attract
its waters to itself all the waters of the sea would
he raised and would flow to the body of the moon.
The sphere of the attractive virtue which is in the
moon extends as far as the earth, and entices up the
waters; but as the moon flies rapidly across the zenith,
and the waters cannot follow so quickly, a flow of
the ocean is occasioned in the torrid zone towards
the westward. If the attractive virtue of the
moon extends as far as the earth, it follows with
greater reason that the attractive virtue of the earth
extends as far as the moon and much farther; and, in
short, nothing which consists of earthly substance
anyhow constituted although thrown up to any height,
can ever escape the powerful operation of this attractive
virtue. Nothing which consists of corporeal matter
is absolutely light, but that is comparatively lighter
which is rarer, either by its own nature, or by accidental
heat. And it is not to be thought that light
bodies are escaping to the surface of the universe
while they are carried upwards, or that they are not
attracted by the earth. They are attracted, but
in a less degree, and so are driven outwards by the
heavy bodies; which being done, they stop, and are
kept by the earth in their own place. But although
the attractive virtue of the earth extends upwards,
as has been said, so very far, yet if any stone should
be at a distance great enough to become sensible compared
with the earth’s diameter, it is true that on
the motion of the earth such a stone would not follow
altogether; its own force of resistance would be combined
with the attractive force of the earth, and thus it
would extricate itself in some degree from the motion
of the earth.” The above passage from the
Introduction to Kepler’s “Commentaries
on the Motion of Mars,” always regarded as his
most valuable work, must have been known to Newton,
so that no such incident as the fall of an apple was
required to provide a necessary and sufficient explanation
of the genesis of his Theory of Universal Gravitation.
Kepler’s glimpse at such a theory could have
been no more than a glimpse, for he went no further
with it. This seems a pity, as it is far less
fanciful than many of his ideas, though not free from
the “virtues” and “animal faculties,”
that correspond to Gilbert’s “spirits
and humours”. We must, however, proceed
to the subject of Mars, which was, as before noted,
the first important investigation entrusted to Kepler
on his arrival at Prague.