his estimation, be calculated to affect injuriously
the feelings of individuals against whom I have no
complaint,”—thus giving Mr. Davis
all the discretionary power with which he claims to
have been invested, and making him the judge as to
what letters should be destroyed. We have no
more space to expose Mr. Parton’s blunders and
sophistry. The evidence of Burr’s debauchery,
of his heartless vanity, of his utter disregard of
the considerations which usually govern even the worst
of men, does not rest upon the admissions of Davis
alone. Those who are familiar with a scandalous
book called the “Secret History of St. Domingo,”
which consists of a series of letters addressed to
Col. Burr by Madame D’Auvergne, will need
no further illustration of his influence over women,
nor of the character of those with whom he was most
intimately associated. The night before his duel
with Hamilton, he committed all the letters of his
female correspondents to the care and perusal of Theodosia,
saying that she would “find in them something
to amuse, much to instruct, and more to forgive.”
When in Europe, he kept a journal in which he recorded
his various amorous adventures. This book, as
published, is one which no gentleman would place in
the hands of a lady, and the editor tells us that
the most improper portions of the diary have been
expurgated; yet this journal was written, not to amuse
a scandal-loving public, not for purposes of gain,
but for the private perusal of Theodosia. What
can be said of a man who could expose the lascivious
expressions of abandoned females and retail his own
debaucheries to a gentle and innocent woman, and that
woman his own daughter? The mere statement beggars
invective. It shows a mind so depraved as to
be unconscious of its depravity.
The character of Burr is not difficult to analyze.
His life was consistent, and at the beginning a wise
man might have foretold the end. Our author complains
that Burr’s reputation has suffered from the
disposition to exaggerate his faults. This may
be true; but it is likewise true that he has been
benefited by the same disposition to exaggeration.
A character is more dramatic which unites great talents
with great vices, and therefore he has been represented
both as a worse and a greater man than he really was.
Burr cannot be called great in any sense. His
successes, such as they were, never appear to have
been obtained by high mental effort. He has left
not a single measure, no speech, no written discussion
of the various important subjects that came before
him, to which one can point as an exhibition of superior
talents. A certain description of ability cannot
be denied to him. He did well whatever could
be done by address, courage, and industry, joined
to moderate talents. His chief power lay in the
fascination of personal intercourse. His countenance
was pleasing, and illuminated by eyes of singular
beauty and vivacity; his bearing was lofty; his self-possession