recognition of the plan of Divine Providence generally,
I have implicitly touched upon a prominent question
of the day, viz., that of the possibility of
knowing God; or rather—since public opinion
has ceased to allow it to be a matter of question—the
doctrine that it is impossible to know God. In
direct contravention of what is commanded in holy
Scripture as the highest duty—that we should
not merely love, but know God—the prevalent
dogma involves the denial of what is there said—namely,
that it is the Spirit, der Geist, that leads
into truth, knows all things, penetrates even into
the deep things of the Godhead. While the Divine
Being is thus placed beyond our knowledge and outside
the limit of all human things, we have the convenient
license of wandering as far as we list, in the direction
of our own fancies. We are freed from the obligation
to refer our knowledge to the Divine and True.
On the other hand, the vanity and egoism which characterize
our knowledge find, in this false position, ample
justification; and the pious modesty which puts far
from itself the knowledge of God can well estimate
how much furtherance thereby accrues to its own wayward
and vain strivings. I have been unwilling to
leave out of sight the connection between our thesis—that
Reason governs and has governed the world—and
the question of the possibility of a knowledge of God,
chiefly that I might not lose the opportunity of mentioning
the imputation against philosophy of being shy of
noticing religious truths, or of having occasion to
be so; in which is insinuated the suspicion that it
has anything but a clear conscience in the presence
of these truths. So far from this being the case,
the fact is that in recent times philosophy has been
obliged to defend the domain of religion against the
attacks of several theological systems. In the
Christian religion God has revealed Himself—that
is, He has given us to understand what He is, with
the result that He is no longer a concealed or secret
existence. And this possibility of knowing Him,
thus afforded us, renders such knowledge a duty.
God wishes for His children no narrow-hearted souls
or empty heads, but those whose spirit is of itself
indeed, poor, but rich in the knowledge of Him, and
who regard this knowledge of God as the only valuable
possession. That development of the thinking
spirit, which has resulted from the revelation of the
Divine Being as its original basis, must ultimately
advance to the intellectual comprehension of what
was presented, in the first instance, to feeling and
imagination. The time must eventually come for
understanding that rich product of active Reason which
the history of the world offers to us. It was
for a while the fashion to profess admiration for
the wisdom of God, as displayed in animals, plants,
and isolated occurrences. But if it be allowed
that Providence manifests itself in such objects and
forms of existence, why not also in universal history?