us as little as the reach of space; even the building
of our planet, and man’s infancy, have the faint
and distant reality of cradle records. Science
may reconstruct the inchoate body of animal man, the
clay of our mould, and piece together the primitive
skeleton of the physical being we now wear; but the
mind steadily refuses to recognize a human past without
some discipline in the arts, some exercise in rude
virtue, and some proverbial lore handed down from
sire to son. The tree of knowledge is of equal
date with the tree of life; nor were even the tamer
of horses, the worker in metals, or the sower, elder
than those twin guardians of the soul,—the
poet and the priest. Conscience and imagination
were the pioneers who made earth habitable for the
human spirit; they are still its lawgivers and where
they have lodged their treasures, there is wisdom.
I desire to renew the long discussion of the nature
and method of idealism by engaging in a new defence
of poetry, or the imaginative art in any of its kinds,
as the means by which this wisdom, which is the soul’s
knowledge of itself, is stored up for the race in
its most manifest, enduring, and vital forms.
It is, by literary tradition and association, a proud
task. May I not take counsel of Spenser and be
bold at the first door? Sidney and Shelley pleaded
this cause. Because they spoke, must we be dumb?
or shall not a noble example be put to its best use
in trying what truth can now do on younger lips?
The old hunt is up in the Muses’ bower; and I
would fain speak for that learning which has to me
been light. I use this preface not unwillingly
in open loyalty to studies on which my youth was nourished,
and the masters I then loved whom the natural thoughts
of youth made eloquent; my hope is to continue their
finer breath, as they before drank from old fountains;
but chiefly I name them as a reminder that the main
argument is age-long; it does not harden into accepted
dogma; and it is thus ceaselessly tossed because it
belongs in that sphere of our warring nature where
conflict is perpetual. It goes on in the lives
as well as on the lips of men. It is a question
how to live as well as how to express life. Each
race uses its own tongue, each age its dialect; but,
change the language as man may, he ever remains the
questioner of his few great thoughts.
The defenders of the soul inherit an old cause that links them together in a long descent; but the battle is always to a present age. Continually something is becoming superfluous, inapplicable, or wanting in the work of the past. Victory itself makes arms useless, and consigns them to dark closets. New times, new weapons, is the history of all warfare. The doubt of the validity of the ideal, never absent from any intellectual period, is active on all sides, and in more than one quarter passes into denial. Literature and the other arts of expression suffer throughout the world. To that point is it come that those of the old stock who believe that the imagination