The defence of Louis Napoleon was conducted by M. Berryer, the great leader of the Legitimists, who, twenty-five years before, had aided in the defence of Ney, and who, nearly twenty years later, defended Montalembert, his client of 1840 being in this last case the prosecutor.  In his speech in defence of the Prince, this first of French orators and advocates made use of language, the recollection of which in after-days must have been attended with very conflicting emotions.  Addressing himself to the judges, he said,—­“Standing where I do, I do not think that the claims of the name in which this project was attempted can possibly fall humiliated by the disdainful expressions of the Procureur General.  You make remarks upon the weakness of the means employed, of the poverty of the whole enterprise, which made all hope of success ridiculous.  Well, if success is anything, I will say to you who are men,—­you, who are the first men in the state,—­you, who are members of a great political body,—­there is an inevitable and eternal Arbitrator between every judge and every accused who stands before him;—­before giving your judgment, now, being in presence of this Arbitrator, and in face of the country, which will hear your decrees, tell me this, without regard now to weakness of means, but with the rights of the case, the laws, and the institution before your eyes, and with your hands upon your hearts, as standing before your God, and in presence of us, who know you, will you say this:—­’If he had succeeded, if his pretended right had triumphed, I would have denied him and it,—­I would have refused all share in his power,—­I would have denied and rejected him’?  For my part, I accept the supreme arbitration I have mentioned; and whoever there may be amongst you, who, before their God, and before their country, will say to me,—­’If he had succeeded, I would have denied him,’—­such a one will I accept for judge in this case.”  In making this sweeping challenge, M. Berryer knew that he was hitting the Court of Peers hard, for it contained men who had been leading Napoleonists in the days of the Empire, and others who wore ready to join any government which should be powerful enough to establish itself; while it left the Legitimists, the orator’s own party, unharmed.  They were the only men, according to M. Berryer’s theory of defence, who would have furnished an impartial tribunal for the trial of his client; for they alone, with strict truth, could have said that they would deny his right, and refuse to share in his power, no matter at what time he should succeed in accomplishing his designs.