and, generally speaking, I think it might be applied
to all cases in which the toil spent over the making
of a thing is out of all proportion to the enjoyment
derived from it. But the difficulty underlying
it is that it assumes a knowledge of what a man’s
duty is in this world—and I am not by any
means sure that we know. Look at the phrase ’a
waste of time.’ How do we know exactly how
much time a man ought to allot to sleep, to work,
to leisure? I had an old puritanical friend who
was very fond of telling people that they wasted time.
He himself spent nearly two hours of every day in
dressing and undressing. That is to say that when
he died at the age of seventy-six, he had spent about
six entire years in making and unmaking his toilet!
Let us assume that everyone is bound to give a certain
amount of time to doing the necessary work of the
world—enough to support, feed, clothe, and
house himself, with a margin to spare for the people
who can’t support themselves and can’t
work. Then there are a lot of outlying things
which must be done—the work of statesmen,
lawyers, doctors, writers—all the people
who organise, keep order, cure, or amuse people.
Then there are all the people who make luxuries and
comforts—things not exactly necessary, but
still reasonable indulgences. Now let us suppose
that anyone is genuinely and sensibly occupied in
any one of these ways, and does his or her fair share
of the world’s work: who is to say how
such workers are to spend their margin of time?
There are obviously certain people who are mere drones
in the hive—rich, idle, extravagant people:
we will admit that they are wasters. But I don’t
admit for a moment that all the time spent in enjoying
oneself is wasted, and I think that people have a
right to choose what they do enjoy. I am inclined
to believe that we are here to live, and that work
is only a part of our material limitations. A
great deal of the usefulness of work is not its intrinsic
value, but its value to ourselves. It isn’t
only what we perform that matters; it is the fact
that work forces us into relations with other people,
which I take to be the experience we all need.
In the old dreary books of my childhood, the elders
were always hounding the young people into doing something
useful—useful reading, useful sewing, and
so forth. But I am inclined to believe that sociability
and talk are more useful than reading, and that solitary
musing and dreaming and looking about are useful too.
All activity is useful, all interchange, all perception.
What isn’t useful is anything which hides life
from you, any habit that drugs you into inactivity
and idleness, anything which makes you believe that
life is romantic and sentimental and fatuous.
I wouldn’t even go so far as to say that all
the time spent in squabbling and quarrelling is useless,
because it brings you up against people who think
differently from yourself. That becomes wasteful
the moment it leaves you with the impotent desire