Page 384.  “In a word, if the bishops are not supreme, &c.”  Here he reassumeth his arguments for Popery, that there cannot be a body politic of the Church through the whole world, without a visible head to have recourse to.  These were formerly writ to advance Popery, and now to put an absurdity upon the hypothesis of a Catholic Church.  As they say in Ireland, in King James’s time, they built mass-houses, which we make very good barns of.

Page 388.  “Bishops are, under a premunire obliged to confirm and consecrate the person named in the conge d’Elire.”  This perhaps is complained of.  He is permitted to do it.  We allow the legislature may hinder if they please; as they may turn out Christianity, if they think fit.

Page 389.  “It is the magistrate who empowers them to do more for other bishops than they can for themselves, since they cannot appoint their own successors.”  Yes they could, if the magistrate would let them.  Here is an endless splutter, and a parcel of perplexed distinctions upon no occasion.  All that the clergy pretend to, is a right of qualifying men for the ministry, something like what a university doth with degrees.  This power they claim from God, and that the civil power cannot do it as pleasing to God without them; but they may choose whether they will suffer it or no.  A religion cannot be crammed down a nation’s throat against their will; but when they receive a religion, it is supposed they receive as their converters give it; and, upon that foot, they cannot justly mingle their own methods, that contradict that religion, &c.

Page 390.  “With us the bishops act only ministerially and by virtue of the regal commission, by which the prince firmly enjoins and commands them to proceed in choosing, confirming, and consecrating, &c.”  Suppose we held it unlawful to do so:  How can we help it? but does that make it rightful, if it be not so?  Suppose the author lived in a heathen country, where a law would be made to call Christianity idolatrous; would that be a topic for him to prove it so by, &c.?  And why do the clergy incur a pre-munire;—­To frighten them—­Because the law understandeth, that, if they refuse, the chosen cannot be a bishop:  But, if the clergy had an order to do it otherwise than they have prescribed, they ought and would incur an hundred rather.

Page 402.  “I believe the Catholic Church, &c.”  Here he ridicules the Apostles’ Creed.—­Another part of his scheme.—­By what he says in these pages, it is certain, his design is either to run down Christianity, or set up Popery; the latter it is more charitable to think, and, from his past life, highly probable.

Page 405.  “That which gave the Papists so great advantage was, clergymen’s talking so very inconsistent with themselves, &c.”  State the difference here between our separation from Rome, and the dissenters from us, and shew the falseness of what he sayeth.  I wish he would tell us what he leaveth for a clergyman to do, if he may not instruct the people in religion, and if they should not receive his instructions.