Page 78.  “But not to digress”—­Pray, doth he call scurrility upon the clergy, a digression?  The apology needless, &c.

Ibid.  “A clergyman, it is said, is God’s ambassador.”  But you know an ambassador may have a secretary, &c.

Ibid.  “Call their pulpit speeches, the word of God.”  That is a mistake.

Page 79.  “Such persons to represent Him.”  Are not they that own His power, fitter to represent Him than others?  Would the author be a fitter person?

Ibid.  “Puffed up with intolerable pride and insolence.”  Not at all; for where is the pride to be employed by a prince, whom so few own, and whose being is disputed by such as this author?

Ibid.  “Perhaps from a poor servitor, &c. to be a prime minister in God’s kingdom.”  That is right.  God taketh notice of the difference between poor servitors, &c.  Extremely foolish—­shew it.  The argument lieth strongly against the apostles, poor fishermen; and St. Paul, a tentmaker.  So gross and idle!

Page 80.  “The formality of laying hand over head on a man.”  A pun; but an old one.  I remember, when Swan[16] made that pun first, he was severely checked for it.

[Footnote 16:  Captain Swan was a celebrated low humorist and punster who frequented Will’s Coffee-house when it was the fashionable resort of men of wit and pleasure. [T.  S.]]

Ibid.  “What more is required to give one a right, &c.”  Here shew, what power is in the church, and what in the state to make priests.

Page 85.  “To bring men into, and not turn them out of the ordinary way of salvation.”  Yes; but as one rotten sheep doth mischief—­and do you think it reasonable, that such a one as this author, should converse with Christians, and weak ones.

Page 86.  See his fine account of spiritual punishment.

Page 87.  “The clergy affirm, that if they had not the power to exclude men from the Church, its unity could not be preserved.”  So to expel an ill member from a college, would be to divide the college; as in All-Souls, &c.  Apply it to him.[17]

[Footnote 17:  Tindal was a fellow of All Souls College. [T.  S.]]

Page 88.  “I cannot see but it is contrary to the rules of charity, to exclude men from the Church, &c.”  All this turns upon the falsest reasoning in the world.  So, if a man be imprisoned for stealing a horse, he is hindered from other duties:  And, you might argue, that a man who doth ill, ought to be more diligent in minding other duties, and not to be debarred from them.  It is for contumacy and rebellion against that power in the church, which the law hath confirmed.  So a man is outlawed for a trifle, upon contumacy.

Page 92.  “Obliging all by penal laws to receive the sacrament.”  This is false.

Page 93.  “The want of which means can only harden a man in his impenitence.”  It is for his being hardened that he is excluded.  Suppose a son robbeth his father on the highway, and his father will not see him till he restoreth the money and owneth his fault.  It is hard to deny him paying his duty in other things, &c.  How absurd this!