in 1708; and his dedication of the latter to Lady Berkeley lends this suggestion added weight.  That the original edition of the “Project” is dated 1709 is nothing to the point, since it is well-known that the booksellers often antedated their publications, as publishers do now, when the issue occurred towards the end of a year.  Moreover, the letter of the Earl of Berkeley to Swift, which Scott misdates 1706-1707, but which should be 1708, makes special reference to this very tract, showing that it was certainly published in 1708.  “I earnestly entreat you,” writes the earl, “if you have not done it already, that you would not fail of having your bookseller enable the Archbishop of York [Dr. Sterne] to give a book to the queen; for, with Mr. Nelson, I am entirely of opinion, that Her Majesty’s reading of that book on the Progress for the Increase of Morality and Piety, may be of very great use to that end.”  I have never seen a copy of the first edition of “The Sentiments,” and I cannot fix the exact date of its publication; but it was certainly not written before the “Project.”  The “Project,” therefore, must be considered in the light of a preliminary essay to the fuller and more digested statement of “The Sentiments of a Church of England man”; and I have, on this account, placed it as the second tract written by Swift in the year 1708.

Whatever may be thought of the particular methods which Swift suggested for realizing his reformatory scheme, and they were, no doubt, artificial and wooden enough; the tract itself remains an excellent survey of the evils and gross habits of the time.  The methods may be Utopian (Swift himself thought they were open to discussion), but the spirit of sincerity and piety is unmistakable.  It is worth remembering, however, that several of the proposals, such as those for closing the public-houses at twelve o’clock at night; the penalizing of publicans who supplied drink to drunken customers; the building of churches, have since been adopted.

I cannot agree with Mr. Churton Collins ("Jonathan Swift,” pp. 59-61) in suspecting Swift of a special policy of self-interest in writing the “Project.”  Swift was too honest a man to use the religious sentiment for the purpose of counteracting any bad impression his previous writings had made on those who had the power to advance him.  However much he might delight in the possession of high worldly station, he would never so prostitute himself to obtain it.  Nor did he care to let the world into the secret of his heart.  Indeed, all his life Swift seemed to hide, almost jealously, the genuine piety of his nature.  Whatever suspicion of policy has surrounded the tract must be ascribed to the well-intentioned letter of the Earl of Berkeley above quoted; and the Earl would not have written thus had he felt Swift’s motive to be any other than a purely impersonal one.