to God in the name and mediation of Christ.  As a priest and prelate, he was obliged to say something of Christianity; but pray observe, sir, how he brings himself off.  He justly affirms that even these things are of less moment than natural duties; and because mothers’ nursing their children is a natural duty, it is of more moment than the two sacraments, or than praying to God in the name and by the mediation of Christ.  This freethinking archbishop could not allow a miracle sufficient to give credit to a prophet who taught anything contrary to our natural notions:  By which it is plain, he rejected at once all the mysteries of Christianity.

I could name one-and-twenty more great men, who were all freethinkers; but that I fear to be tedious:  For, ’tis certain that all men of sense depart from the opinions commonly received; and are consequently more or less men of sense, according as they depart more or less from the opinions commonly received; neither can you name an enemy to freethinking, however he be dignified or distinguished, whether archbishop, bishop, priest, or deacon, who has not been either “a crack-brained enthusiast, a diabolical villain, or a most profound ignorant brute.”

Thus, sir, I have endeavoured to execute your commands, and you may print this Letter, if you please; but I would have you conceal my name.  For my opinion of virtue is, that we ought not to venture doing ourselves harm, by endeavouring to do good.

I am yours, &c.

I have here given the public a brief, but faithful abstract of this most excellent Essay; wherein I have all along religiously adhered to our author’s notions, and generally to his words, without any other addition than that of explaining a few necessary consequences, for the sake of ignorant readers; for, to those who have the least degree of learning, I own they will be wholly useless.  I hope I have not, in any single instance, misrepresented the thoughts of this admirable writer.  If I have happened to mistake through inadvertency, I entreat he will condescend to inform me, and point out the place, upon which I will immediately beg pardon both of him and the world.  The design of his piece is to recommend freethinking, and one chief motive is the example of many excellent men who were of that sect.  He produces as the principal points of their freethinking; that they denied the Being of a God, the Torments of Hell, the Immortality of the Soul, the Trinity, Incarnation, the history of the creation by Moses, with many other such “fabulous and blasphemous stories,” as he judiciously calls them:  And he asserts, that whoever denies the most of these, is the completest freethinker, and consequently the wisest and most virtuous man.  The author, sensible of the prejudices of the age, does not directly affirm himself an atheist; he goes no further than to pronounce that atheism is the most perfect degree of freethinking; and leaves the reader to form the conclusion.  However, he seems to