Dr. John Wallis (1616-1703), here referred to, is the famous mathematician and divine, and one of the original members of the Royal Society.  He is mentioned in the text by Swift because of a work he published on the Trinity, which brought him into collision with the Arians.  But the Doctor seems to have been addicted to views of a controversial nature, for his opinions on infant baptism and the keeping of the Sabbath found many objectors.  He was Savilian Professor of Geometry at Oxford in 1648. [T.S.]]

[Footnote 12:  See Swift’s opinion of controversies on this subject in his “Sermon upon the Trinity.” [S.]]

Our priests likewise dispute several circumstances about the resurrection of the dead, the nature of our bodies after the resurrection, and in what manner they shall be united to our souls.  They also attack one another “very weakly with great vigour,” about predestination.  And it is certainly true, (for Bishop Taylor and Mr. Whiston the Socinian say so,) that all churches in prosperity alter their doctrines every age, and are neither satisfied with themselves, nor their own confessions; neither does any clergyman of sense believe the Thirty-nine Articles.

Our priests differ about the eternity of hell torments.  The famous Dr Henry More,[13] and the most pious and rational of all priests, Dr Tillotson,[14] (both freethinkers,) believe them to be not eternal.  They differ about keeping the sabbath, the divine right of episcopacy, and the doctrine of original sin; which is the foundation of the whole Christian religion; for if men are not liable to be damned for Adam’s sin, the Christian religion is an imposture:  Yet this is now disputed among them; so is lay baptism; so was formerly the lawfulness of usury, but now the priests are common stock-jobbers, attorneys, and scriveners.  In short there is no end of disputing among priests, and therefore I conclude, that there ought to be no such thing in the world as priests, teachers, or guides, for instructing ignorant people in religion; but that every man ought to think freely for himself.

[Footnote 13:  Dr. Henry More (1614-1687), the Platonist theologian, wrote a philosophical poem entitled, “Psycho-Zoia, or the Life of the Soul” (1640). [T.S.]]

[Footnote 14:  Dr. John Tillotson (1630-1694) succeeded Bancroft as Archbishop of Canterbury.  He published some eloquent sermons and several controversial tracts against Catholicism. [T.S.]]

I will tell you the meaning in all this; the priests dispute every point in the Christian religion, as well as almost every text in the Bible; and the force of my argument lies here, that whatever point is disputed by one or two divines, however condemned by the Church, not only that particular point, but the whole article to which it relates, may lawfully be received or rejected by any freethinker.  For instance, suppose More and Tillotson deny the eternity of hell torments, a freethinker may deny all future punishments whatsoever.