NOTE.

In November, 1707, Swift left Dublin in the train of the then Lord Lieutenant, Lord Pembroke.  His travelling companion was Sir Andrew Fountaine, who, on landing in England, set out with Lord Pembroke for Wilton, while Swift went on to Leicester to visit his mother.  He stayed with her until some time in December, but, by the middle of the same month, he was in London.  During this absence from Ireland Swift corresponded somewhat freely with Archbishop King of Dublin, and with Archdeacon Walls—­the letters to the former were first printed in Forster’s “Life of Swift.”  For these Forster was indebted to the Rev. Mr. Reeves (vicar of Lusk, co.  Dublin), who discovered them in the record-room of the see of Armagh (see “Life,” p. 205 et seq. and note).  One of Swift’s intentions, while in the metropolis, was to push forward the claim of the Irish clergy for the remission of the First Fruits and Tenths, a grant which had already been conceded to the English clergy; and his letters to King often include requests for the necessary papers by means of which he could lay the matter before either Godolphin or Somers.  Walls had written to Swift of the vacancy of the see of Waterford, and, from the reply to the archdeacon, we learn that even at so early a date Swift suffered a grievous disappointment; for in January, 1708, the bishopric, of which Swift had hopes, was presented to Dr. Thomas Milles.  In his letter to Walls Swift confesses that he “once had a glimpse that things would have gone otherwise....  But let us talk no further on this subject.  I am stomach-sick of it already. ...  Pray send me an account of some smaller vacancy in the Government’s gift.”  It was to Somers, and through him to Lord Halifax, that Swift looked for recognition, either for services rendered, or because of their appreciation of his abilities.  But, however much he may have been disappointed at their inaction, it may not be argued, as it has been, that Swift’s so-called change in his political opinions was the outcome either of spleen or chagrin against the Whigs for their ingratitude towards him.  It is, indeed, questionable whether Swift ever changed his political opinions, speaking of these as party opinions.  From the day of his entrance, it may be said, into the orders of the Church, his first thought was for it; and on all political questions which touched Church matters Swift was neither Whig nor Tory, but churchman.  It was because of the attitude of the Whigs towards the Church that Swift left them; and in his writings he does not spare the Tories even when he finds them taking up similar attitudes.  On purely political questions Swift was too independent a thinker to be influenced by mere party views.  That he wrote for the Tories must be put down to Harley’s personal influence, and to his foresight which saw in Swift a man who must be treated as an equal with the highest in the land.  Swift’s intercourse with the