“No; certainly not.”

“Not even if the discussion had occurred previously to the period affected by your memory?”

“I don’t exactly catch, your meaning, Doctor.”

“I mean to ask what attitude your mind has, in one of your ‘states,’ toward unsettled questions.”

“No attitude whatever; I know nothing of such, one way or the other.”

“How, then, could you ever form an opinion upon a disputed question?”

“I don’t know, Doctor; I suppose that if I should ever form an opinion upon anything merely speculative, I should have to do it from new material, or repeated material, of thought.”

“But now let us reverse this supposition:  suppose that to-morrow you are in one of your ‘states,’ and you hear a discussion and draw a conclusion; will this conclusion remain with you next week when you have recovered the chain of your memory?”

“Yes.”

“And your mind would hold to its former decision?”

“Oh, no; not necessarily.  I mean that my memory would retain the fact that I had formerly decided the matter.”

“And in your recovered state you might reverse a decision made while in a lapse?”

“Certainly.”

“But the undoubted truths, or material facts, as some people call them, would still be undoubted?”

“Yes.”

“And objects seen while in a ‘state’ will be remembered by you when you recover?”

“Vividly; if I could draw, I could draw them as well as if they were present.”

“It would not be wrong, then, to say that what you lose in one period you gain in another? that what you lose in things doubtful you gain in intensity of fact?”

“Certainly not wrong, though I cannot say that the loss of one causes the gain of the other.”

“That is not important; yet I suspect it is true that your faculty is quickened in one function, by relaxation in another.  You know that the hearing of the blind is very acute.”

“Yes, but I don’t see how all this shows my case to be a good thing.”

“You can imagine situations in which, hearing is of greater value than sight?”

“Yes.”

“A blind scout might be more valuable on a dark night than one who could see.”

“Yes, but I cannot see how this affects me; I am neither blind nor deaf, nor am I a scout.”

“But it can be said that a good memory may be of greater value at one time than another.”

“Oh, yes; I suppose so.”

“Now,” said Dr. Khayme, “I do not wish you to believe for a moment that there is at present any occasion for you to turn scout; I have merely instanced a possible case in which hearing is more valuable than sight, and we have agreed that memory is worth, more at times than at other times.  I should like to relieve you, moreover, of any fears that you, may have in regard to the continuance of your infirmity—­as you insist on thinking it.  Cases like yours always recover.”