Nowhere else in the United States are women allowed to shelter their weak moral natures behind the stern morality of their husbands, but in more than one State the husband’s responsibility for his wife’s acts is assumed.  In Massachusetts, for one State, if a woman owned a saloon and sold beer on Sunday, she would be liable to arrest, and so also would her husband, provided he were in the house when the beer was sold.  Both would probably be fined.  Simply because it was once the law that a married woman had no separate existence apart from her husband, this absurd law, or others as absurd, remain on the statute books of almost every State in the Union.

The ascent of woman, which began with the abolishment of corporeal punishment of wives, proceeded very slowly.  Most American women married, and most American wives were kindly treated.  At least public opinion demanded that they be treated with kindness.  Long before any other modification of her legal status was gained, a woman subjected to cruelty at the hands of her lawful spouse was at liberty to seek police protection.

The reason why police protection was so seldom sought is plain enough.  Imagine a woman complaining of a husband who would be certain to beat her again for revenge, and to whom she was bound irrevocably by laws stronger even than the laws on the statute books.  Remember that the only right she had was the right to be supported, and if she left her husband’s house she left her only means of living.  She could hardly support herself, for few avenues of industry were open to women.  She was literally a pauper, and when there is nowhere else to lay his head, even the most miserable pauper thinks twice before he runs away from the poorhouse.  Besides, the woman who left her husband had to give up her children.  They too were the husband’s property.

There were some women who hesitated before they consented to pauperize themselves by marrying.  Widows were especially wary, if old stories are to be trusted.  A story is told in the New York University Law School of a woman in Connecticut who took with her, as a part of her wedding outfit, a very handsome mahogany bureau, bequeathed her by her grandfather.  After a few years of marriage the husband suddenly died, leaving no will.  The home and all it contained were sold at auction.  The widow was permitted to buy certain objects of furniture, and among them was her cherished bureau.  Where the poor woman found the money with which to buy is not revealed.  In time this woman married again, and again her husband died without a will.  Again there was an auction, and again the widow purchased her beloved heirloom.  It seems possible that this time she had saved money in anticipation of the necessity.

A little later, for she was still young and attractive, a suitor appeared, offering his heart and “all his worldly goods.”  “No, I thank you,” replied the sorely tried creature, “I prefer to keep my bureau.”