Into her mouth, too, is put the following picture of the bride which has some kinship with contemporary baroque in Italian architecture and painting, and also occasionally anticipates in a remarkable manner the diction of the following century.
The holy Priest had joyn’d
their hands, and now
Night grew propitious to their
Bridall vow,
Majestick Juno, and young
Hymen flies
To light their Pines at faire
Parthenia’s eyes;
The little Graces amourously
did skip,
With the small Cupids, from
each lip to lip;
Venus her selfe was present,
and untide
Her virgine Zone;[309] when
loe, on either side
Stood as her handmaids, Chastity
and Truth,
With that immaculate guider
of her youth
Rose-colour’d Modestie:
These did undresse
The beauteous maid, who now
in readinesse,
The Nuptiall tapers waving
’bout her head,
Made poore her garments, and
enrich’d her bed. (IV. i.)
So again we find single expressions which are striking, as when Parthenia bids Amphialus, sooner than appease her wrath, to hope
To charme the Genius of the world to peace; (V.)
or when, dying, she commends herself to her dead lover:
take
my breath
That flies to thee on the
pale wings of death. (ib.)
And yet it would be scarcely unfair to describe these as for the most part the beauties of decay; they are as rich embroidery upon rotten cloth, and are achieved by careful elaboration of sensuous imagination, and the art of arresting the attention upon a commonplace thought by the use of some striking epithet or novel and daring turn of expression. For the wider and more essential beauties of conception, character, and construction we look in vain in Glapthorne’s play.
Sidney’s Arcadia, however, though the most important, was not the only so-called pastoral romance which left dramatic progeny. It has been customary to describe the Thracian Wonder, a play of uncertain authorship, as founded upon the story of Curan and Argentile in Warner’s Albion’s England, a metrical emporium of historical legend very popular at the close of the sixteenth century. The narrative in question was later expanded into a separate work by one William Webster, and published in 1617.[310] That Collier should have given a quite erroneous abstract of Warner’s tale, and should then have proceeded to claim it as the source of the play in question, is perhaps no great matter for astonishment, nor need it particularly surprise us to find certain modern critics swallowing the whole fiction on Collier’s authority. What is extraordinary is that a scholar of Dyce’s ability and learning should have been misled. For it is quite evident that the Thracian Wonder is based, though hardly closely, on no less famous a work than Greene’s Menaphon.[311] This should of course have been apparent to critics