Sir Francis Walsingham, to the effect that the bookseller,
William Ponsonby, had informed him that some one was
about to print the Arcadia, and that if they
were acting without authority a notification of the
fact should be lodged with the archbishop. Greville
proceeds to say that he had sent to Walsingham’s
daughter, that is, Lady Sidney, the corrected manuscript
of the work ’don 4 or 5 years sinse, which he
left in trust with me; wherof there is no more copies,
and fitter to be reprinted then the first, which is
so common[144].’ A complaint was evidently
lodged, and the publication stayed, and we may assume
that Ponsonby was rewarded for his notification by
being entrusted with the publication of the revised
manuscript mentioned by Greville, for it was from his
house that issued the quarto edition of 1590.
Evidence that it was Greville who was responsible
for the publication of the Arcadia is found
in the dedication of Thomas Wilson’s manuscript
translation from the Diana, where, addressing
Greville, the translater speaks of Sir Philip’s
Arcadia, ‘w^{ch} by yo^{r} noble vertue
the world so hapily enjoyes.’ In this edition,
containing the first two and a half books only, the
division into chapters and the arrangement of the
incidental verse were the work of the ‘over-seer
of the print.’ The text, however, was not
considered satisfactory, and when the romance was
reprinted in 1593 the division into chapters was discarded,
certain alterations were made in the arrangement of
the verse, and there was added another portion of the
third book, together with a fourth and fifth, compiled
by the Countess of Pembroke from the loose sheets
sent her from time to time by her brother. This
edition has been commonly regarded as the first published
with due authority, and the term ‘surreptitious’
has been quite unjustly applied to the original quarto.
The charge, indeed, receives colour from the preface,
signed H. S., to the second edition; but, whoever H.
S. may have been, there is nothing to make one suppose
that he was speaking with authority. The quarto
of 1590 having been duly licensed on August 23, 1588,
the rights of the work were in Ponsonby’s hands,
and to him the publication of the revised edition
had to be entrusted. In 1598 a third edition,
to which other remains of the author were for the
first time added, was also published by Ponsonby.
There still remained, however, a lacuna in Book III,
which was not remedied till 1621, when a supplement
was added from the pen of Sir William Alexander.
In the edition of 1627 a sixth book was appended,
the work of one Richard Beling, whose initials alone,
however, appear. The early editors seem to have
assumed that the unfinished state of the work, or
rather the unrevised state of the later portions, was
due to the author’s early death, but most of
it must have been written between the years 1581 and
1583, and it may well be questioned whether in any
case Sidney would have bestowed any further attention