“Speedily will be published, The Sermons of
Mr. Yorick.” The judicious Dodsley, or
possibly the judicious Sterne himself (acute enough
in matters of this kind), had perceived that now was
the time to publish a series of sermons by the very
unclerical lion of the day. There would—they,
no doubt, thought—be an undeniable piquancy,
a distinct flavour of semi-scandalous incongruity
in listening to the Word of Life from the lips of
this loose-tongued droll; and the more staid and serious
the sermon, the more effective the contrast.
There need not have been much trouble in finding the
kind of article required; and we may be tolerably
sure that, even if Sterne did not perceive that fact
for himself, his publisher hastened to inform him
that “anything would do.” Two of
his pulpit discourses, the Assize Sermon and the Charity
Sermon, had already been thought worthy of publication
by their author in a separate form; and the latter
of these found a place in the series; while the rest
seem to have been simply the chance sweepings of the
parson’s sermon-drawer. The critics who
find wit, eccentricity, flashes of Shandyism, and
what not else of the same sort in these discourses,
must be able—or so it seems to me—to
discover these phenomena anywhere. To the best
of my own judgment the Sermons are—with
but few and partial exceptions—of the most
commonplace character; platitudinous with the platitudes
of a thousand pulpits, and insipid with the crambe
repetita of a hundred thousand homilies.
A single extract will fully suffice for a specimen
of Sterne’s pre-Shandian homiletic style; his
post-Shandian manner was very different, as we shall
see. The preacher is discoursing upon the well-worn
subject of the inconsistencies of human character:
“If such a contrast was only observable in the different stages of a man’s life, it would cease to be either a matter of wonder or of just reproach. Age, experience, and much reflection may naturally enough be supposed to alter a man’s sense of things, and so entirely to transform him that, not only in outward appearance but in the very cast and turn of his mind, he may be as unlike and different from the man he was twenty or thirty years ago as he ever was from anything of his own species. This, I say, is naturally to be accounted for, and in some cases might be praiseworthy too; but the observation is to be made of men in the same period of their lives that in the same day, sometimes on the very same action, they are utterly inconsistent and irreconcilable with themselves. Look at the man in one light, and he shall seem wise, penetrating, discreet, and brave; behold him in another point of view, and you see a creature all over folly and indiscretion, weak and timorous as cowardice and indiscretion can make him. A man shall appear gentle, courteous, and benevolent to all mankind; follow him into his own house, maybe you see a tyrant morose and savage to all whose happiness depends upon his kindness.