“Qua Cursum Ventus.
“As ships, becalmed at eve, that
lay
With canvas drooping,
side by side,
Two towers of sail at dawn of day,
Are scarce long leagues
apart descried:
“When fell the night, upsprung the
breeze,
And all the darkling
hours they plied,
Nor dreamt but each the self-same seas
By each was cleaving
side by side:
“E’en so——But
why the tale reveal
Of those whom, year
by year unchanged,
Brief absence joined anew to feel,
Astounded, soul from
soul estranged?
“At dead of night their sails were
filled,
And onward each rejoicing
steered:
Ah, neither blame, for neither willed,
Or wist, what first
with dawn appeared!
“To veer, how vain! On, onward
strain,
Brave barks! In
light, in darkness too,
Through winds and tides one compass guides:
To that, and your own
selves, be true!
“But, O blithe breeze! and O great
seas!
Though ne’er,
that earliest parting past,
On your wide plain they join again,
Together lead them home
at last!
“One port, methought, alike they
sought,
One purpose hold where’er
they fare:
O bounding breeze! O rushing seas!
At last, at last, unite
them there!”
“In 1848-49 the revolutionary crisis came on Europe, and Clough’s sympathies drew him with great earnestness into the struggles which were going on. He was in Paris directly after the barricades, and in Rome during the siege, where he gained the friendship of Saffi and other leading Italian patriots.” A part of his experiences and his thoughts while at Rome are interwoven with the story in his “Amours de Voyage,” a poem which exhibits in extraordinary measure the subtilty and delicacy of his powers, and the fulness of his sympathy with the intellectual conditions of the time. It was first published in the “Atlantic Monthly” for 1858, and was at once established in the admiration of readers capable of appreciating its rare and refined excellence. The spirit of the poem is thoroughly characteristic of its author, and the speculative, analytic turn of his mind is represented in many passages of the letters of the imaginary hero. Had he been writing in his own name, he could not have uttered his inmost conviction more distinctly, or have given the clue to his intellectual life more openly than in the following verses:—