by the strange and unwonted teaching, which partly
made them smile, partly perhaps permanently disgusted
them, but which also, they could not deny, spoke in
a language more fearless, more pathetic, more subtle,
and yet more human, than they had heard from the religious
teachers of the day. And thus the circle of persons
interested in the Tracts, of persons who sympathised
with their views, of persons who more and more gave
a warm and earnest adherence to them, was gradually
extended in the University—and, in time,
in the country also. The truth was that the movement,
in its many sides, had almost monopolised for the time
both the intelligence and the highest religious earnestness
of the University,[60] and either in curiosity or
inquiry, in approval or in condemnation, all that
was deepest and most vigorous, all that was most refined,
most serious, most high-toned, and most promising in
Oxford was drawn to the issues which it raised.
It is hardly too much to say that wherever men spoke
seriously of the grounds and prospects of religion,
in Oxford, or in Vacation reading-parties, in their
walks and social meetings, in their studies or in
common-room, the “Tractarian” doctrines,
whether assented to or laughed at, deplored or fiercely
denounced, were sure to come to the front. All
subjects in discussion seemed to lead up to them—art
and poetry, Gothic architecture and German romance
and painting, the philosophy of language, and the novels
of Walter Scott and Miss Austen, Coleridge’s
transcendentalism and Bishop Butler’s practical
wisdom, Plato’s ideas and Aristotle’s
analysis. It was difficult to keep them out of
lecture-rooms and examinations for Fellowships.
But in addition to the intrinsic interest of the questions
and discussions which the movement opened, personal
influence played a great and decisive part in it.
As it became a party, it had chiefs. It was not
merely as leaders of thought but as teachers with their
disciples, as friends with friends, as witnesses and
examples of high self-rule and refined purity and
goodness, that the chiefs whose names were in all
men’s mouths won the hearts and trust of so many,
in the crowds that stood about them. Foremost,
of course, ever since he had thrown himself into it
in 1835, was Dr. Pusey. His position, his dignified
office, his learning, his solidity and seriousness
of character, his high standard of religious life,
the charm of his charity, and the sweetness of his
temper naturally gave him the first place in the movement
in Oxford and the world. It came to be especially
associated with him. Its enemies fastened on
it a nickname from his name, and this nickname, partly
from a greater smoothness of sound, partly from an
odd suggestion of something funny in it, came more
into use than others; and the terms Puseismus,
Puseisme, Puseista found their way into German
lecture-halls and Paris salons and remote convents
and police offices in Italy and Sicily; indeed, in
the shape of [Greek: pouzeismos] it might be