something approaching education. Severus, to be
sure, had trained him in all pursuits, bar none, that
tended to inculcate virtue, whether physical or mental,
so that even after he became emperor he went to teachers
and studied philosophy most of the day. He also
took oil rubbings without water and rode horseback
to a distance of seven hundred and fifty stades.
Moreover, he practiced swimming even in rough water.
In consequence of this, Antoninus was, as you might
say, strong, but he paid no heed to culture, since
he had never even heard the name of it. Still,
his language was not bad, nor did he lack judgment,
but he showed in almost everything a keen appreciation
and talked very readily. For through his authority
and recklessness and his habit of saying right out
without reflection anything at all that occurred to
him, and not being ashamed to air his thoughts, he
often stumbled upon some felicitous expression. [But
the same Antoninus made many mistakes through his
headstrong opinions. It was not enough for him
to know everything: he wanted to be the only
one who knew anything. It was not enough for him
to have all power: he would be the only one with
any power. Hence it was that he employed no counselor
and was jealous of such men as knew something worth
while. He never loved a single person and he hated
all those who excelled in anything; and most did he
hate those whom he affected most to love. Many
of these he destroyed in some way or other. Of
course he had many men murdered openly, but others
he would send to provinces not suited to them, fatal
to their physical condition, having an unwholesome
climate; thus, while pretending to honor them excessively,
he quietly got rid of them, exposing such as he did
not like to excessive heat or cold. Hence, though
he spared some in so far as not to put them to death,
yet he subjected them to such hardships that the stain
[Footnote: This is very likely an incorrect translation
of an incorrect reading. The various editors
of Dio have a few substitutes to propose, but as all
the interpretations seem to me extremely lumbering
I have turned the Ms. [Greek] chelidoysthai (taken
as a passive) in a way that may be not quite beyond
the bounds of possibility. The noun [Greek] chelhist
like the English “stain,” often passes
from its original sense of “blemish” to
that of the consequent “disgrace.”] of
murder still rested on him.
The above describes him in general terms.
[Sidenote: A.D. 213(?)] [Sidenote:—12—] Now we shall state what sort of person he showed himself in war. [Abgarus, king of the Osrhoeni, when he had once got control of the kindred tribes, inflicted the most outrageous treatment upon his superiors. Nominally he was compelling them to change to Roman customs, but in fact he was making the most of his authority over them in an unjustifiable way.] He tricked the king of the Osrhoeni, Abgarus, inducing him to visit him as a friend, and then arrested and imprisoned him. This left Osrhoene without a ruler and he subdued it.