[whole] Life.  Upon which the Disciples all burst out a laughing, as thinking they had detected the Falshood and Vanity of his Art.  But Socrates told them, that the Principles of his Art might be very true, notwithstanding his present Mistake; for that he himself was naturally inclined to those particular Vices which the Physiognomist had discovered in his Countenance, but that he had conquered the strong Dispositions he was born with by the Dictates of Philosophy.

We are indeed told by an ancient Author, that Socrates very much resembled Silenus in his Face; [12] which we find to have been very rightly observed from the Statues and Busts of both, [that [13]] are still extant; as well as on several antique Seals and precious Stones, which are frequently enough to be met with in the Cabinets of the Curious.  But however Observations of this Nature may sometimes hold, a wise Man should be particularly cautious how he gives credit to a Man’s outward Appearance.  It is an irreparable Injustice [we [14]] are guilty of towards one another, when we are prejudiced by the Looks and Features of those whom we do not know.  How often do we conceive Hatred against a Person of Worth, or fancy a Man to be proud and ill-natured by his Aspect, whom we think we cannot esteem too much when we are acquainted with his real Character?  Dr. Moore, [15] in his admirable System of Ethicks, reckons this particular Inclination to take a Prejudice against a Man for his Looks, among the smaller Vices in Morality, and, if I remember, gives it the Name of a Prosopolepsia.

[Footnote 1:  every Man is]

[Footnote 2:  Master]

[Footnote 3:  unknown Persons]

[Footnote 4:  Socrates.  In Apul.  ’Flor’.]

[Footnote 5:  that]

[Footnote 6:  The idea is as old as Aristotle who, in treating of arguing from signs in general, speaks under the head of Physiognomy of conclusions drawn from natural signs, such as indications of the temper proper to each class of animals in forms resembling them.  The book Addison refers to is Baptista della Porta ‘De Human, Physiognomia’]

[Footnote 7:  ‘Histoire du Louis de Bourbon II. du Nom Prince de Conde,’ Englished by Nahum Tate in 1693.]

[Footnote 8:  that the]

[Footnote 9:  Cicero, ‘Tusc.  Quaest.’  Bk.  IV. near the close.  Again ‘de Fato’, c. 5, he says that the physiognomist Zopyrus pronounced Socrates stupid and dull, because the outline of his throat was not concave, but full and obtuse.]

[Footnote 10:  who he was.]

[Footnote 11:  seen]

[Footnote 12:  Plato in the ‘Symposium’; where Alcibiades is made to draw the parallel under the influence of wine and revelry.  He compares the person of Socrates to the sculptured figures of the Sileni and the Mercuries in the streets of Athens, but owns the spell by which he was held, in presence of Socrates, as by the flute of the Satyr Marsyas.]