to us the Scriptures? I may be thought bold
in my Judgment by some; but I must affirm, That
no one Orator has left us so visible Marks and Footsteps
of his Eloquence as our Apostle. It may perhaps
be wondered at, that in his Reasonings upon Idolatry
at
Athens, where Eloquence was born and flourished,
he confines himself to strict Argument only; but
my Reader may remember what many Authors of the best
Credit have assured us, That all Attempts upon the
Affections and Strokes of Oratory were expressly
forbidden, by the Laws of that Country, in Courts
of Judicature. His want of Eloquence therefore
here, was the Effect of his exact Conformity to the
Laws. But his Discourse on the Resurrection
to the
Corinthians, his Harangue before
Agrippa
upon his own Conversion and the Necessity of that of
others, are truly Great, and may serve as full Examples
to those excellent Rules for the Sublime, which
the best of Criticks has left us. The Sum of
all this Discourse is, That our Clergy have no farther
to look for an Example of the Perfection they may
arrive at, than to St.
Paul’s Harangues;
that when he, under the Want of several Advantages
of Nature (as he himself tells us) was heard, admired,
and made a Standard to succeeding Ages by the best
Judge of a different Persuasion in Religion, I say
our Clergy may learn, That, however instructive
their Sermons are, they are capable of receiving a
great Addition; which St.
Paul has given
them a noble Example of, and the Christian Religion
has furnished them with certain Means of attaining
to.’
* * * *
*
No. 634. Friday, December 17,
1714.
[Greek: Ho elachiston deomenos eggista
theon.]
Socrates apud Xen.
It was the common Boast of the Heathen Philosophers,
that by the Efficacy of their several Doctrines, they
made Humane Nature resemble the Divine. How much
mistaken soever they might be in the several Means
they proposed for this End, it must be owned that the
Design was great and glorious. The finest Works
of Invention and Imagination are of very little Weight,
when put in the Balance with what refines and exalts
the rational Mind. Longinus excuses Homer
very handsomely, when he says the Poet made his Gods
like Men, that he might make his Men appear like the
Gods: But it must be allowed that several of the
ancient Philosophers acted, as Cicero wishes
Homer had done; they endeavoured rather to
make Men like Gods, than Gods like Men.
According to this general Maxim in Philosophy, some
of them have endeavoured to place Men in such a State
of Pleasure, or Indolence at least, as they vainly
imagined the Happiness of the Supreme Being to consist
in. On the other Hand, the most virtuous Sect
of Philosophers have created a chimerical wise Man,
whom they made exempt from Passion and Pain, and thought
it enough to pronounce him All-sufficient.