Fourthly, By shewing
us the Blackness and Deformity of Vice, which
in
the Christian System is so very great, that he who
is
possessed
of all Perfection and the Sovereign Judge of
it,
is represented by several of our Divines as hating
Sin
to the same Degree that he loves the Sacred Person
who
was made the Propitiation of it.
Fifthly, In being
the ordinary and prescribed Method of making
Morality
effectual to Salvation.
I have only touched on these several Heads, which every one who is conversant in Discourses of this Nature will easily enlarge upon in his own Thoughts, and draw Conclusions from them which may be useful to him in the Conduct of his Life. One I am sure is so obvious, that he cannot miss it, namely that a Man cannot be perfect in his Scheme of Morality, who does not strengthen and support it with that of the Christian Faith.
Besides this, I shall lay down two or three other Maxims which I think we may deduce from what has been said.
First, That we should be
particularly cautious of making any
thing an Article of Faith, which does
not contribute to
the Confirmation or Improvement of Morality.
Secondly, That no Article
of Faith can be true and authentick, which
weakens or subverts the practical part
of Religion, or
what I have hitherto called Morality.
Thirdly, That the greatest Friend of Morality, or Natural Religion, cannot possibly apprehend any Danger from embracing Christianity, as it is preserved pure and uncorrupt in the Doctrines of our National Church.
There is likewise another Maxim which I think may be drawn from the foregoing Considerations, which is this, that we should, in all dubious Points, consider any ill Consequences that may arise from them, supposing they should be Erroneous, before we give up our Assent to them.
For example, In that disputable Point of Prosecuting Men for Conscience Sake, besides the imbittering their Minds with Hatred, Indignation, and all the Vehemence of Resentment, and ensnaring them to profess what they do not believe; we cut them off from the Pleasures and Advantages of Society, afflict their Bodies, distress their Fortunes, hurt their Reputations, ruin their Families, make their Lives painful, or put an End to them. Sure when I see such dreadful Consequences rising from a Principle, I would be as fully convinced of the Truth of it, as of a Mathematical Demonstration, before I would venture to act upon it, or make it a part of my Religion.
In this Case the Injury done our Neighbour is plain and evident, the Principle that puts us upon doing it, of a dubious and disputable Nature. Morality seems highly violated by the one, and whether or no a Zeal for what a Man thinks the true System of Faith may justifie it, is very uncertain. I cannot but think, if our Religion produce Charity as well as Zeal, it will not be for shewing it self by such cruel Instances. But, to conclude with the Words of an excellent Author, [1] We have just enough Religion to make us hate, but not enough to make us love, one another.