but quite likely it should be taken in inverse ratio.
I certainly do not see why the mere multiplication
of the species is so indicative of prosperity.
Mobs are not so altogether lovely that one should desire
their indefinite increase. A village is honorable,
not according to the number, but the character of
its residents. The drunkards and the paupers
and the thieves and the idiots rather diminish than
increase its respectability. It seems to me that
the world would be greatly benefited by thinning out.
Most of the places that I have seen would be much
improved by being decimated, not to say quinqueted
or bisected. If people are stubborn and rebellious,
stiff-necked and uncircumcised, in heart and ears,
the fewer of them the better. A small population,
trained to honor and virtue, to liberality of culture
and breadth of view, to self-reliance and self-respect,
is a thousand times better than an overcrowded one
with everything at loose ends. As with the village,
so with the family. There ought to be no more
children than can be healthily and thoroughly reared,
as regards the moral, physical, and intellectual nature
both of themselves and their parents. All beyond
this is wrong and disastrous. I know of no greater
crime, than to give life to souls, and then degrade
them, or suffer them to be degraded. Children
are the poor man’s blessing and Cornelia’s
jewels, just so long as Cornelia and the poor man
can make adequate provision for them. But the
ragged, filthy, squalid, unearthly little wretches
that wallow before the poor man’s shanty-door
are the poor man’s shame and curse. The
sickly, sallow, sorrowful little ones, shadowed too
early by life’s cares, are something other than
a blessing. When Cornelia finds her children
too many for her, when her step trembles and her cheek
fades, when the sparkle flats out of her wine of life
and her salt has lost its savor, her jewels are Tarpeian
jewels. One child educated by healthy and happy
parents is better than seven dragging their mother
into the grave, notwithstanding the unmeasured reprobation
of our little book. Of course, if they can stand
seven, very well. Seven and seventy times seven,
if you like, only let them be buds, not blights.
If we obeyed the laws of God, children would be like
spring blossoms. They would impart as much freshness
and strength as they abstract. They are a natural
institution, and Nature is eminently healthy.
But when they “come crowding into the home-nest,”
as our book daintily says, they are a nuisance.
God never meant the home-nest to be crowded. There
is room enough and elbow-room enough in this world
for everything that ought to be in it. The moment
there is crowding, you may be sure something wrong
is going on. Either a bad thing is happening,
or too much of a good thing, which counts up just
the same. The parents begin to repair the evil
by a greater one. They attempt to patch their
own rents by dilapidating their children. They
recruit their own exhausted energies by laying hold