* * * * *

In the second volume of our author’s works, is a piece entitled More Reformation, a satire upon himself.  We have already taken notice of a satire of his called Reformation of Manners, in which some personal characters are stigmatized, which drew much odium on Mr. De Foe.  This satire called More Reformation, is a kind of supplement to the former.  In the preface he complains of the severe usage he had met with, but, says he, ’that the world may discern that I am not one of those who practice what they reprove, I began this satire with owning in myself those sins and misfortunes which I am no more exempted from, than other men; and as I am far from pretending to be free from human frailties, but forwarder to confess any of the errors of my life, than any man can be to accuse me; I think myself in a better way to reformation, than those who excuse their own faults by reckoning up mine.

’Some that have heard me complain of this hard usage, have told me, there is something of a retaliation of providence in it, for my being so very free with the character’s of other men in a late satire called The Reformation of Manners.  To this I answer, first, in that satire, or any other I ever wrote, I have always carefully avoided lashing any man’s private infirmities, as being too sensible of my own, but if I have singled out any man by character, it has either been such, as intending to reform others, and execute the laws against vice, have been the greatest examples, and encouragers of it in their own practice; or such as have been entrusted with the executive power of justice, and having been called upon by the laws to reform us, have been a public reproach to the magistracy of this nation, and ought to be punished by the laws they have been protected by.

’Secondly, I have never made any man’s disasters, or misfortunes, the subject of my satire.  I never reproached any man for having his house burnt, ships cast away, or his family ruined.  I never lampooned a man because he could not pay his debts, or for his being a cuckold.

’Thirdly, I never reproached any man for his opinion in religion, or esteemed him the worse for differing in judgment from me.

’If therefore the scandalous treatment I have received is just on me, for abusing others, I must ask such, who is the man?  Where is the character I have given that is not just? and where is the retaliation of providence, that these men entitle themselves to in loading me with falsities and lies, as a just punishment for my speaking truth.

’But p-x on him, said a certain sober gentleman, he is a Whig, and what need he have meddled with his own party, could not he have left them out, there were characters enough on the other side?

’Why really I must own, I know no Whig or Tory in vice; the vicious and the virtuous are the only two parties I have to do with; if a vicious, lewd, debauched magistrate happened to be a Whig, what then? let him mend his manners, and he may be a Whig still, and if not, the rest ought to be ashamed of him.’