* The victorious Brissotines, after the 10th of August, availing themselves of the stupor of one part of the people, and the fanaticism of the other, required that the new Convention might be entrusted with unlimited powers.  Not a thousandth portion of those who elected the members, perhaps, comprehended the dreadful extent of such a demand, as absurd as it has proved fatal.—­"Tout pouvoir sans bornes ne fauroit etre legitime, parce qu’il n’a jamais pu avoir d’origine legitime, car nous ne pouvons pas donner a un autre plus de pouvoir sur nous que nous n’en avons nous-memes" [Montesquieu.]:—­that is, the power which we accord to others, or which we have over ourselves, cannot exceed the bounds prescribed by the immutable laws of truth and justice.  The united voice of the whole French nation could not bestow on their representatives a right to murder or oppress one innocent man.

—­Even of these, several have already perished; and in the hands of Robespierre, and half a dozen others of equal talents and equal atrocity, but less cunning, center at present all the fruits of so many miseries, and so many crimes.

In all these conflicts of party, the victory seems hitherto to have remained with the most artful, rather than the most able; and it is under the former title that Robespierre, and his colleagues in the Committee of Public Welfare, are now left inheritors of a power more despotic than that exercised in Japan.—­Robespierre is certainly not deficient in abilities, but they are not great in proportion to the influence they have acquired him.  They may, perhaps, be more properly called singular than great, and consist in the art of appropriating to his own advantage both the events of chance and the labours of others, and of captivating the people by an exterior of severe virtue, which a cold heart enables him to assume, and which a profligacy, not the effect of strong passions, but of system, is easily subjected to.  He is not eloquent, nor are his speeches, as compositions,* equal to those of Collot d’Herbais, Barrere, or Billaud Varennes; but, by contriving to reserve himself for extraordinary occasions, such as announcing plots, victories, and systems of government, he is heard with an interest which finally becomes transferred from his subject to himself.**

* The most celebrated members of the Convention are only readers of speeches, composed with great labour, either by themselves or others; and I think it is distinguishable, that many are manufactured by the same hand.  The style and spirit of Lindet, Barrere, and Carnot, seem to be in common.

** The following passages, from a speech of Dubois Crance, who may be supposed a competent judge, at once furnish an idea of Robespierre’s oratory, exhibit a leading feature in his character, and expose some of the arts by which the revolutionary despotism was maintained: 

"Rapportant tout a lui seul, jusqu’a