or the fundirte inhalt (or as whatever else you may please to call the conjunctive form) which the content falls into when we experience it in the ways which the describers set forth.  Those factors in those relations are what we mean by activity-situations; and to the possible enumeration and accumulation of their circumstances and ingredients there would seem to be no natural bound.  Every hour of human life could contribute to the picture gallery; and this is the only fault that one can find with such descriptive industry—­where is it going to stop?  Ought we to listen forever to verbal pictures of what we have already in concrete form in our own breasts?[1] They never take us off the superficial plane.  We knew the facts already—­less spread out and separated, to be sure—­but we knew them still.  We always felt our own activity, for example, as ’the expansion of an idea with which our Self is identified, against an obstacle’; and the following out of such a definition through a multitude of cases elaborates the obvious so as to be little more than an exercise in synonymic speech.

All the descriptions have to trace familiar outlines, and to use familiar terms.  The activity is, for example,

[Footnote 1:  I ought myself to cry peccavi, having been a voluminous sinner in my own chapter on the will.]

attributed either to a physical or to a mental agent, and is either aimless or directed.  If directed, it shows tendency.  The tendency may or may not be resisted.  If not, we call the activity immanent, as when a body moves in empty space by its momentum, or our thoughts wander at their own sweet will.  If resistance is met, its agent complicates the situation.  If now, in spite of resistance, the original tendency continues, effort makes its appearance, and along with effort, strain or squeeze.  Will, in the narrower sense of the word, then comes upon the scene, whenever, along with the tendency, the strain and squeeze are sustained.  But the resistance may be great enough to check the tendency, or even to reverse its path.  In that case, we (if ‘we’ were the original agents or subjects of the tendency) are overpowered.  The phenomenon turns into one of tension simply, or of necessity succumbed—­to, according as the opposing power is only equal, or is superior to ourselves.

Whosoever describes an experience in such terms as these, describes an experience of activity.  If the word have any meaning, it must denote what there is found. There is complete activity in its original and first intention.  What it is ‘known-as’ is what there appears.  The experiencer of such a situation possesses all that the idea contains.  He feels the tendency, the obstacle, the will, the strain, the triumph, or the passive giving up, just as he feels the time, the space, the swiftness or intensity, the movement, the weight and color, the pain and pleasure, the complexity, or whatever remaining characters the situation may