To many thoughtful people it seemed captious and unreasonable for women to complain of injustice in this free land, amidst such universal rejoicings.  When the majority of women are seemingly happy, it is natural to suppose that the discontent of the minority is the result of their unfortunate individual idiosyncrasies, and not of adverse influences in established conditions.  But the history of the world shows that the vast majority, in every generation, passively accept the conditions into which they are born, while those who demanded larger liberties are ever a small, ostracized minority, whose claims are ridiculed and ignored.  From our standpoint we would honor any Chinese woman who claimed the right to her feet and powers of locomotion; the Hindoo widows who refused to ascend the funeral pyre of their husbands; the Turkish women who threw off their masks and veils and left the harem; the Mormon women who abjured their faith and demanded monogamic relations.  Why not equally honor the intelligent minority of American women who protest against the artificial disabilities by which their freedom is limited and their development arrested?  That only a few, under any circumstances, protest against the injustice of long-established laws and customs, does not disprove the fact of the oppressions, while the satisfaction of the many, if real, only proves their apathy and deeper degradation.  That a majority of the women of the United States accept, without protest, the disabilities which grow out of their disfranchisement is simply an evidence of their ignorance and cowardice, while the minority who demand a higher political status clearly prove their superior intelligence and wisdom.

At the close of the Forty-seventh Congress we made two new demands:  First, for a special committee to consider all questions in regard to the civil and political rights of women.  We naturally asked the question, As Congress has a special committee on the rights of Indians, why not on those of women?  Are not women, as a factor in civilization, of more importance than Indians?  Secondly, we asked for a room, in the Capitol, where our committee could meet, undisturbed, whenever they saw fit.  Though these points were debated a long time, our demands were acceded to at last.  We now have our special committee, and our room, with “Woman Suffrage” in gilt letters, over the door.  In our struggle to achieve this, while our champion, the senior Senator from Massachusetts, stood up bravely in the discussion, the opposition not only ridiculed the special demand, but all attempts to secure the civil and political rights of women.  As an example of the arguments of the opposition, I give what the Senator from Missouri said.  It is a fair specimen of all that was produced on that side of the debate.  Mr. Vest’s poetical flights are most inspiring: