together let no man put asunder.”  Did God join those two together?  They were married in a church.  It is the Church that should repent in sackcloth and ashes for permitting such a mockery of marriage.  Let the Church by all means do what it has so long failed to do, emphasize the sanctity of human relationships, make men and women realize how deep a responsibility they take in marriage, how sacred a thing is this creative love, from which future generations will spring, which brings into the world human bodies and immortal souls; which, even if it is childless, is still the very sacrament of human love.  Let the Church teach all that it can to make marriage sacred and divine, but when it preaches that such a marriage as that is a marriage at all it does not uphold our moral standard but degrades it.

I have said enough before, I hope, to make you realize that I do not think that when passion has gone marriage is dead.  I have seen marriages which seemed unequal, difficult, unblest, made into something lovely and sacred by the deep patience and loyalty of human nature, and believe it is the knowledge of such possibilities which makes Christian people, and even those who would not call themselves Christians, generally desire some religious ceremony when they are married.  They know that for such love human nature itself is hardly great enough.  They desire the grace of God to inspire their love for each other with something of that eternal quality which belongs to the love of God.  I have seen husbands love their wives, and wives their husbands, with a divine compassion, an inexhaustible pity, which goes out to the most unworthy and degraded.  Yes, I would even go so far as to say that unless you feel that you are able to face the possibility of change in the one you love, that you can love so well that even if they alter for the worse your love would no more disappear than the love of God for you would disappear when you change or fail, you have not attained to the perfect love which justifies marriage.  But this is a hard saying, and, therefore, those of us who believe in God in any sense instinctively desire the blessing of God to rest on the undertaking of so great a responsibility.  We want our love to be divine before we can undertake the whole happiness of another human being.  Let the Church by all means teach this, and I believe that future generations will conceive more nobly and more responsibly of marriage for her teaching.  But do not seek to hold together those between whom there is no real marriage at all.  When seriously and persistently a man and a woman believe that their marriage never was or has now ceased to be real, surely their persistent and considered opinion ought to be enough for the State to act upon.  Let no one be allowed to give up in haste.  Let no one fling responsibility aside easily.  Let it always be a question of long consideration, of advice from friends, perhaps even from judges.  But I cannot help feeling that when through years this conviction