way to the Yearly Meeting. First-day. Most
interesting meeting. I think the connection
of evangelical doctrine with Christian worship is
often not enough considered. The mere natural
unsanctified dread or awe of the Lord’s presence
is very different from that worship of God which
is through Christ our Lord, who has made a way of
access for us to the Father, who Himself loveth
us. If this be overlooked, there is little essential
distinction between Christian worship, and Oriental
gnosticism—the delusion of raising the soul
above the natural, by abstraction and contemplation
of the Divine. This is the distinguishing glory
of the gospel, that whereas the children of Israel
said to Moses, “Speak thou to us, but let
not God speak to us, lest we die,” Christ,
his antitype, hath broken down for his people “the
middle wall of partition,” hath abolished
the enmity, and speaketh to us Himself as God, and
yet as once in our flesh.
5th Mo. 10th. Letter from father, from Niagara. Awful spectacle, and most edifying emblem of His unchanging word of power whose voice is as the sound of many waters.
This evening had a nice meeting; my soul
longed
for light and life in the assembly.
Of our dear father’s safe arrival
in Liverpool we
heard on our way to the train in the morning,
and
now we settled in to expect him we had
so long lost!
And, after meeting him in London and alluding to conversation with friends who called to see him, she says,—
“But with father the fact of presence, real meeting, actual talk, seemed more engrossing than the thing talked. Oh that I had a really grateful heart to the Lord for these His mercies!”
7th. [Alluding to a meeting at Devonshire House.] It is, indeed, “looking not at the things which are seen,” when we really accept with equal, nay, with greater, joy, His will to speak by the little as by the great, or by His Spirit only, when communion of truth is preferred to communication of the true.
5th Mo. 29th. And now that my London experience is over, as to meetings, preachings, prayers, what, oh, what is the result on this immortal spirit of mine, which has on this occasion been brought, as it were, in contact with some of the honorable and anointed messengers, with that which is good? And yet it is possible that contact may not produce penetration, and that penetration may not produce assimilation. I can unhesitatingly say, the first and second have been produced; but then these are but transactions of the time, not abiding transformations; and if these are all? But, surely, it cannot be; surely, when my heart melted within me, especially on Second-day morning, and I heard the word “and anon with joy received it,” some depth of central stone was fused into softness; some actual change, effected, that I might not have altogether “no root”