at Ferney, Voltaire took to building, planting, farming.
He established round his castle a small industrial
colony, for whose produce he strove to get a market
everywhere. “Our design,” he used
to say, “is to ruin the trade of Geneva in a
pious spirit.” Ferney, moreover, held grand
and numerously attended receptions; Madame Denis played
her uncle’s pieces on a stage which the latter
had ordered to be built, and which caused as much
disquietude to the austere Genevese as to Jean Jacques
Rousseau. It was on account of Voltaire’s
theatrical representations that Rousseau wrote his
Lettre centre les Spectacles. “I
love you not, sir,” wrote Rousseau to Voltaire:
“you have done me such wrongs as were calculated
to touch me most deeply. You have ruined Geneva
in requital of the asylum you have found there.”
Geneva was about to banish Rousseau before long,
and Voltaire had his own share of responsibility in
this act of severity so opposed to his general and
avowed principles. Voltaire was angry with Rousseau,
whom he accused of having betrayed the cause of philosophy;
he was, as usual, hurried away by the passion of the
moment, when he wrote, speaking of the exile, “I
give you my word that if this blackguard (
polisson)
of a Jean Jacques should dream of coming (to Geneva),
he would run great risk of mounting a ladder which
would not be that of Fortune.” At the
very same time Rousseau was saying, “What have
I done to bring upon myself the persecution of M.
de Voltaire? And what worse have I to fear from
him? Would M. de Buffon have me soften this tiger
thirsting for my blood? He knows very well that
nothing ever appeases or softens the fury of tigers;
if I were to crawl upon the ground before Voltaire,
he would triumph thereat, no doubt, but he would rend
me none the less. Basenesses would dishonor
me, but would not save me. Sir, I can suffer,
I hope to learn how to die, and he who knows how to
do that has never need to be a dastard.”
Rousseau was high-flown and tragic; Voltaire was cruel
in his contemptuous levity; but the contrast between
the two philosophers was even greater in the depths
of them than on. the surface. Rousseau took
his own words seriously, even when he was mad, and
his conduct was sure to belie them before long.
He was the precursor of an impassioned and serious
age, going to extremes in idea and placing deeds after
words. In spite of occasional reticence dictated
by sound sense, Voltaire had abandoned himself entirely
in his old age to that school of philosophy, young,
ardent, full of hope and illusions, which would fain
pull down everything before it knew what it could
set up, and the actions of which were not always in
accordance with principles. “The men were
inferior to their ideas.” President De
Brosses was justified in writing to Voltaire, “I
only wish you had in your heart a half-quarter of the
morality and philosophy contained in your works.”
Deprived of the counterpoise of political liberty,