set off at a gallop, rode all night, and arrived next
day early on the frontier of Moravia, an Austrian province.
The royal flight created a great uproar at Cracow;
the noblemen, and even the peasants, armed with stakes
and scythes, set out in pursuit of their king.
They did not come up with him; they fell in with his
chancellor only, Guy du Faur, Sieur de Pibrac, who
had missed him at the appointed meeting-place, and
who, whilst seeking to rejoin him, had lost himself
in the forests and marshes, concealed himself in the
osiers and reeds, and been obliged now and then to
dip his head, in the mud to avoid the arrows discharged
on all sides by the peasants in pursuit of the king.
Being arrested by some people who were for taking
him back to Cracow and paying him out for his complicity
in his master’s flight, he with great difficulty
obtained his release and permission to continue his
road. Destined to become more celebrated by his
writings and by his Quatrains moraux than by his courtly
adventures, Pibrac rejoined King Henry at Vienna,
where the Emperor Maximilian II. received him with
great splendor. Delivered from fatigue and danger,
Henry appeared to think of nothing but resting and
diverting himself; he tarried to his heart’s
content at Vienna, Venice, Ferrara, Mantua, and Turin.
He was everywhere welcomed with brilliant entertainments,
which the Emperor Maximilian and the senators of Venice
accompanied with good advice touching the government
of France in her religious troubles; and the nominal
sovereign of two kingdoms took nearly three months
in going from that whence he had fled to that of which
he was about to take possession. Having started
from Cracow on the 18th of June, 1574, he did not arrive
until the 5th of September at Lyons, whither the queen-mother
had sent his brother, the Duke of Alencon, and his
brother-in-law, the King of Navarre, to receive him,
going herself as far as Bourgoin in Dauphiny, in order
to be the first to see her darling son again.
The king’s entry into France caused, says De
Thou, a strange revulsion in all minds. “During
the lifetime of Charles IX., none had seemed more
worthy of the throne than Henry, and everybody desired
to have him for master. But scarcely had he
arrived when disgust set in to the extent of auguring
very ill of his reign. There was no longer any
trace in this prince, who had been nursed, so to speak,
in the lap of war, of that manly and warlike courage
which had been so much admired. He no longer
rode on horseback; he did not show himself amongst
his people, as his predecessors had been wont to do;
he was only to be seen shut up with a few favorites
in a little painted boat which went up and down the
Saone he no longer took his meals without a balustrade,
which did not allow him to be approached any Hearer;
and if anybody had any petitions to present to him,
they had to wait for him as he came out from dinner,
when he took them as he hurried by. For the
greater part of the day he remained closeted with
some young folks, who alone had the prince’s
ear, without any body’s knowing how they had
arrived at this distinction, whilst the great, and
those whose services were known, could scarcely get
speech of him. Showiness and effeminacy had
taken the place of the grandeur and majesty which
had formerly distinguished our kings.” [De Thou,
Histoire universelle, t. vii. p. 134.]