as they were resolved. They discovered that
Francis I. had given Bonnivet four hundred thousand
crowns in gold that he might endeavor to bribe the
electors; it was, according to report, double the
sum Charles of Austria had promised for the same object;
and his agents sent him information of it, and received
this answer: “We are wholly determined
to spare nothing and to stake all for all upon it,
as the matter we most desire and have most at heart
in this world. . . . The election must be
secured, whatever it may cost me.” The
question before the seven elective princes who were
to dispose of the empire was thenceforth merely which
of the two claimants would be the higher and the safer
bidder. Francis I. engaged in a tussle of wealth
and liberality with Charles of Austria. One of
his agents wrote to him, “All will go well if
we can fill the maw of the Margrave Joachim of Brandenburg;
he and his brother the elector from Mayence fall every
day into deeper depths of avarice; we must hasten
to satisfy them with speed, speed, speed.”
Francis I. replied, “I will have Marquis Joachim
gorged at any price;” and he accordingly
made over to him in ready money and bills of short
dates all that was asked for by the margrave, who
on the 8th of April, 1519, gave a written undertaking
to support the candidature “of the most invincible
and Most Christian prince, Francis, by the grace of
God King of the French, Duke of Milan, and Lord of
Genoa, who, what with his vigorous age, his ability,
his justice, his military experience, the brilliant
fortune of his arms, and all other qualities required
for war and the management of the commonwealth, surpasses,
in the judgment of every one, all other Christian
princes.” But Charles of Austria did not
consider himself beaten because two of the seven electors
displayed avarice and venality. His aunt Margaret
and his principal agent in Germany, the Chamberlain
Armerstoff, resumed financial negotiations with the
Archbishop of Mayence, for his brother the margrave
as well as for himself, and the archbishop, without
any formal engagement, accepted the Austrian over-bid.
“I am ashamed at his shamelessness,”
wrote Armerstorff to Charles. Alternate and antagonistic
bargaining went on thus for more than two months.
The Archbishop of Cologne, Hermann von Wied, kept
wavering between the two claimants; but he was careful
to tell John d’Albret, Francis I.’s agent,
that “he sincerely hoped that his Majesty would
follow the doctrine of God, who gave as much to those
who went to work in His vineyard towards the middle
of the day as to those who had been at it all the morning.”
Duke Frederick of Saxony was the only one of the
seven electors who absolutely refused to make any
promise, as well as to accept any offer, and preserved
his independence, as well as his dignity. The
rumor of all these traffickings and these uncertainties
rekindled in Henry viii., King of England, a
fancy for placing himself once more in the ranks; but