that he might be lodged at the castle, seeing that
all those who had come were evil disposed towards him.
The duke was very much rejoiced thereat, had him
lodged there, and stoutly assured him that he had
no cause for doubt.” Next day parleys began
between the councillors of the two princes.
They did not appear much disposed to come to an understanding,
and a little sourness of spirit was beginning to show
itself on both sides, when there came news which excited
a grand commotion. “King Louis, on coming
to Peronne, had not considered,” says Commynes,
“that he had sent two ambassadors to the folks
of Liege to excite them against the duke. Nevertheless,
the said ambassadors had advanced matters so well
that they had already made a great mass (of rebels).
The Liegese came and took by surprise the town of
Tongres, wherein were the Bishop of Liege and the
Lord of Humbercourt, whom they took also, slaying,
moreover, some servants of the said bishop.”
The fugitives who reported this news at Peronne made
the matter a great deal worse than it was; they had
no doubt, they said, but that the bishop and Sire
d’Humbercourt had also been murdered; and Charles
had no more doubt about it than they. His fury
was extreme; he strode to and fro, everywhere relating
the news from Liege. “So the king,”
said he, “came here only to deceive me; it is
he who, by his ambassadors, excited these bad folks
of Liege; but, by St. George, they shall be severely
punished for it, and he, himself, shall have cause
to repent.” He gave immediate orders to
have the gates of the town and of the castle closed
and guarded by the archers; but being a little troubled,
nevertheless, as to the effect which would be produced
by this order, he gave as his reason for it that he
was quite determined to have recovered a box full of
gold and jewels which had been stolen from him.
“I verily believe,” says Commynes, “that
if just then the duke had found those whom he addressed
ready to encourage him, or advise him to do the king
a bad turn, he would have done it; but at that time
I was still with the said duke; I served him as chamberlain,
and I slept in his room when I pleased, for such was
the usage of that house. With me was there none
at this speech of the duke’s, save two grooms
of the chamber, one called Charles de Visen, a native
of Dijon, an honest man, and one who had great credit
with his master; and we exasperated nought, but assuaged
according to our power.”
Whilst Duke Charles was thus abandoning himself to the first outburst of his wrath, King Louis remained impassive in the castle of Peronne, quite close to the great tower, wherein, about the year 925, King Charles the Simple had been confined by Herbert, Count of Vermandois, and died a prisoner in 929. None of Louis’s people had been removed from him; but the gate of the castle was strictly guarded. There was no entering. on his service, but by the wicket, and none of the duke’s people came to visit him; he had no occasion to parley, explain himself,