This skull is a relic, interesting from its dramatic associations.  It has been used for fifty or sixty years as a ‘property’ at the Walnut Street Theatre, whenever ‘Hamlet’ has been performed, and as ’Yorick’s skull’ has been handled in that play, from Edmund Kean down to Henry Irving and Edwin Booth.  It is preserved with care, and mounted on a piece of polished black marble.  Surely here is a skull whose experiences are singular above all ordinary skulls, and in whose career its original owner might be not unreasonably expected to cherish some interest or to have followed its fortunes with some little attention.  Untold possibilities for the vindication of Spiritualistic truth and power hang around it, should there be an unwavering agreement by all Spiritual authorities, as to the circumstances, when alive, of its original owner.  Surely, I concluded, the translated inhabitants of the ‘summer-land’ cannot have doffed the homespun honesty of mortal life; all will either confess ignorance with regard to this skull, or display their truthfulness by a substantial harmony in their reports, and thereby furnish an indisputable, irrefragable proof of the truth of Spiritualism.

Sincere in this trust, I wrote on a small sheet of paper this question:  “What was the name, age, sex, color or condition in life of the owner, when alive, of the skull here in my library? 28 February, 1885.”  This paper was put in an envelope, whereof the flap was then gummed to within a small distance of the point, under this point some sealing-wax was dropped, and enough was added above it to form a large, heavy, substantial impression.  At the four corners additional seals, with different impressions, were placed.  Thus gummed, and sealed with five seals, the envelope was enclosed to Dr. J.V.  Mansfield, with a request that it be subjected to his Mediumistic power.

In a few days the following was received: 

’Boston, March 2d, 1885.

Dear Furness.—­Your package came duly to hand most respectfully say I have given the package two sittings and re’d from two different spirits (purported) answer one coroberating [sic] the other statement One from Robt Hair [sic] the other from Dr B. Rush for the two communicates my charge is 5.00 which if you will send me per registered mail I will remit you per return mail Respfy J.V.  Mansfield I judge from the com. it relates to a skeleton.’

With this letter the sealed envelope was returned, apparently in exactly the same state in which it had been sent; the seals were intact, with the exception perhaps of a few trifling fractures, for which the transit to and from Boston, through the mail, would readily account.  Upon closer inspection, however, and upon turning the envelope so as to catch the light, I thought that a slight glazing of gum was discernible around the central seal, and from beneath its edge a minute bubble of mucilage protruded.  The fee demanded was at once forwarded, and by return of mail the following ‘communicates’ were received, written in pencil on long strips of common paper, and in two different hands: